“…In addition, for SVM-based ranking, different percentages of 2D-ZINC were used as negative training examples: 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% corresponding to 14, 144, 1442, and 14 423 compounds, respectively. Activity classes are abbreviated according to Table 1. print search calculations mirror trends that are generally observed; 29,30 that is, search performance is compound-classdependent and varies among different fingerprint designs. In the calculations reported here, on average, Molprint2D produced the highest recovery rates, followed by Daylight, TGT, TGD, and MACCS.…”