2007
DOI: 10.1002/cmdc.200600225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 2D Fingerprint Methods for Multiple‐Template Similarity Searching on Compound Activity Classes of Increasing Structural Diversity

Abstract: We studied the similarity search performance of differently designed molecular fingerprints using multiple reference structures and different search strategies. For this purpose, nine compound activity classes were assembled that exclusively consisted of molecules with different core structures and that represented different levels of intra-class structural diversity. Thus, there was a strict one-to-one correspondence between test compounds and core structures. Analysis of unique core structures was found to b… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
72
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
2
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, for SVM-based ranking, different percentages of 2D-ZINC were used as negative training examples: 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% corresponding to 14, 144, 1442, and 14 423 compounds, respectively. Activity classes are abbreviated according to Table 1. print search calculations mirror trends that are generally observed; 29,30 that is, search performance is compound-classdependent and varies among different fingerprint designs. In the calculations reported here, on average, Molprint2D produced the highest recovery rates, followed by Daylight, TGT, TGD, and MACCS.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Trialssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In addition, for SVM-based ranking, different percentages of 2D-ZINC were used as negative training examples: 0.001%, 0.01%, 0.1%, and 1% corresponding to 14, 144, 1442, and 14 423 compounds, respectively. Activity classes are abbreviated according to Table 1. print search calculations mirror trends that are generally observed; 29,30 that is, search performance is compound-classdependent and varies among different fingerprint designs. In the calculations reported here, on average, Molprint2D produced the highest recovery rates, followed by Daylight, TGT, TGD, and MACCS.…”
Section: Virtual Screening Trialssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The result obtained showed a preference of fingerprints to the nearest neighbours method, which is able to do so by using the multiple combination of information from the reference set as a whole [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Similar methods (i.e centroid and nearest neighbours) have been used by [10] with an addition of a newly introduced frequency method to perform multi-template searching using a range of 2D fingerprints. The result obtained showed a preference of fingerprints to the nearest neighbours method, which is able to do so by using the multiple combination of information from the reference set as a whole [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, fingerprint searching usually becomes more effective when multiple reference compounds (and hence more chemical information) are available [2,24]. For fingerprint searching using multiple reference molecules, different methods have been introduced [2,10,11,24,25]. For example, fingerprint averaging -also known as the centroid method-or data fusion of multiple Tc values can be applied to compare a database compound to a reference set [7].…”
Section: Search Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%