2015
DOI: 10.1097/mph.0000000000000399
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 3 Postthrombotic Syndrome Assessment Scales Demonstrates Significant Variability in Children and Adolescents With Deep Vein Thrombosis

Abstract: Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is an important outcome in children with deep vein thrombosis (DVT). There are several instruments to measure PTS, and no accepted "gold standard." The objective of this cross-sectional prospective study was to compare the prevalence of PTS in patients above 8 years old with a history of DVT using 3 scales: the Villalta scale, a pediatric modification of the Villalta scale, and the Manco-Johnson instrument. Forty-four subjects (22 females) were enrolled; mean age 16.6 years (SD 3.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, we do not have PTS scoring on all 18 patients, nor do all 18 patients have scoring with both the Villalta and modified Villalta. These two scores have shown significant variability in young pediatric and adolescent patients, with higher rates of positive PTS scoring using the modified Villalta scale compared with the Villalta scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, we do not have PTS scoring on all 18 patients, nor do all 18 patients have scoring with both the Villalta and modified Villalta. These two scores have shown significant variability in young pediatric and adolescent patients, with higher rates of positive PTS scoring using the modified Villalta scale compared with the Villalta scale.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is good correlation between the modified Villalta Scale and the Manco-Johnson instrument in assessing paediatric PTS and the use of both is advocated. 47,55 However, when these were compared with the adult Villalta Scale in children aged 12–18, significant discrepancy was identified with 66% of children diagnosed as having PTS using the modified Villalta Scale, but only 11% when using the adult version. 55 This raises questions over when adult scales become appropriate in paediatric practice.…”
Section: Diagnosis Of Ptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the use of these tools is a step in the right direction toward a standardized definition of PTS, a shared limitation of these instruments is their inability to fully measure the functional impact of PTS in children, limiting their sensitivity to distinguish clinically significant (cs) from non‐cs PTS, and likely leading to the overdiagnosis of this complication in children 10 . Although both tools have shown a very good correlation with each other when identifying PTS as present or absent, this correlation decreases when characterizing PTS by severity, highlighting the disparity in their definition and sensitivity to detect PTS in its more severe forms 11 . Thus, the full clinical impact of pediatric PTS and the true incidence of cs‐PTS remain to be elucidated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%