2016
DOI: 10.1063/1.4968856
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 3D reconstruction of mandible for pre-operative planning using commercial and open-source software

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They have penetrated the medical market and have proven to be more robust and cost-effective than their commercial counterparts (Ratib et al , 2011). The software may provide manual, semi-automatic or automatic segmentation capability, but they tend to be either very broad or very specific in the scope of functionality that they provide (Abdullah et al , 2016). For example, three-dimensional Slicer (Scanlan et al , 2018) and MIPAV (https://mipav.cit.nih.gov/) software provide large-scale packages/functionalities; however, due to the large number of features that they provide, they carry a steep learning curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They have penetrated the medical market and have proven to be more robust and cost-effective than their commercial counterparts (Ratib et al , 2011). The software may provide manual, semi-automatic or automatic segmentation capability, but they tend to be either very broad or very specific in the scope of functionality that they provide (Abdullah et al , 2016). For example, three-dimensional Slicer (Scanlan et al , 2018) and MIPAV (https://mipav.cit.nih.gov/) software provide large-scale packages/functionalities; however, due to the large number of features that they provide, they carry a steep learning curve.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, Abdullah et al (2016) compared the three-dimensional reconstruction of mandible segmented using MIMICS and open-source medical imaging interaction toolkit (MITK) software on five CT images. Results of the geometric differences showed average errors of two three-dimensional models were less than 1 per cent using HD and no significant differences in the measurement of the landmarks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threshold-based algorithms or morphological operations are commonly used first for the separation of bony structures from soft tissues. [6][7][8] Then manual work is needed to separate the mandible from the cranial base and the maxilla because the algorithms cannot distinguish between different facial bones with similar intensity values. We refer to this combination of computerized operations and manual editing as 'interactive' segmentation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the processing of CT and MRI data is routinely performed with commercial software. Materialise Mimics (Leuven, Belgium) can be considered the state-of-the-art software in this field and is the most used by professionals worldwide [11]. However, usage of open-source software as an alternative to a commercial one is incrementally taking place because they guarantee satisfactory performance [11], are versatile and can be readily extended and redistributed.…”
Section: State Of the Art 21 Reconstruction Of An Anatomical District: Methods And Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Materialise Mimics (Leuven, Belgium) can be considered the state-of-the-art software in this field and is the most used by professionals worldwide [11]. However, usage of open-source software as an alternative to a commercial one is incrementally taking place because they guarantee satisfactory performance [11], are versatile and can be readily extended and redistributed. As main disadvantages, they often lack user-friendliness and are limited to research purposes.…”
Section: State Of the Art 21 Reconstruction Of An Anatomical District: Methods And Toolsmentioning
confidence: 99%