2005
DOI: 10.3183/npprj-2005-20-03-p283-288
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of 3D structural characteristics of high and low resolution X-ray microtomographic images of paper

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Holmstad et al . () found that the porosity of the handsheet, as measured by a high‐resolution X‐ray μCT, was higher than those measured by a corresponding low‐resolution tomography device.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Holmstad et al . () found that the porosity of the handsheet, as measured by a high‐resolution X‐ray μCT, was higher than those measured by a corresponding low‐resolution tomography device.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Characterization Methodsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…X-μCT is a non-destructive method for obtaining the three-dimensional structure of a physical material sample. It is well suited for structural analysis of complex heterogeneous materials such as paper, biological materials and fibrous composites (Samuelsen et al, 2001;Holmstad et al, 2005;Axelsson, 2008). In addition, FESEM is a powerful technique for assessment of a variety of materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The applicability of low‐resolution X‐ray microtomography was discussed by Holmstad et al 2005. Compared to the synchrotron radiation based technique with a maximum resolution of about 0.35 μm per voxel, a lower resolution in the range of 1–5 μm per voxel is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another important application of X-ray microtomography was the analysis of porosity and permeability, as well as the thermal conductivity of fibrous materials (Goel et al, 2004;Rolland du Roscoat et al, 2005;Lux et al, 2006;Rolland du Roscoat et al, 2008;Axelsson & Svensson, 2009). The applicability of low-resolution X-ray microtomography was discussed by Holmstad et al 2005. Compared to the synchrotron radiation based technique with a maximum resolution of about 0.35 µm per voxel, a lower resolution in the range of 1-5 µm per voxel is possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%