2012
DOI: 10.1212/wnl.78.1_meetingabstracts.p03.053
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a 1.5T Standard vs. 3T Optimized Protocols in Multiple Sclerosis Patients (P03.053)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…7T could improve radiological correlations with neurological disability as increased field strength provides greater sensitivity to lesions. 22,23 Potentially correlations at lower field strengths are hampered by insensitivity to lesions as suggested in Figure 4. Further tests are needed to compare SC lesion identification in multiple scanning planes across field strengths but our data suggests a substantial improvement in lesion conspicuity at 7T.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7T could improve radiological correlations with neurological disability as increased field strength provides greater sensitivity to lesions. 22,23 Potentially correlations at lower field strengths are hampered by insensitivity to lesions as suggested in Figure 4. Further tests are needed to compare SC lesion identification in multiple scanning planes across field strengths but our data suggests a substantial improvement in lesion conspicuity at 7T.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fMRI BOLD 3 Tesla (3T) measurements section of the study highlights the advantages of using 3T MRI over the standard 1.5T, including superior resolution, reduced scan time, and increased sensitivity, particularly beneficial for motor function and somatosensory processing tasks [16][17][18]. The study involved two fMRI sessions on a healthy, normosmic female subject without comorbidities to assess the feasibility of data processing, safety, and the absence of brain alterations that could skew results.…”
Section: Fmri Bold 3 Tesla Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…В то же время применение современных КВ при РС в рекомендованной дозе (0,1 ммоль/кг) зачастую не эффективно, а повышение дозы ведет к увеличению частоты возникновения побочных эффектов [11]. Для решения этой проблемы применяют различные методы [12] и режимы сканирования [13][14][15][16][17][18][19], а также разрабатывают новые КВ (высокорелаксивные хе-латы гадолиния, наночастицы оксида железа, макромолекулярные конъюгаты, векторные препараты), способные с более высокой чувствительностью визуализировать патологические очаги при РС и повышать точность диагностического заключения [20,21].…”
Section: методы исследования и диагностикиunclassified