2020
DOI: 10.3390/medicina56020093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a Five-Year Survival and Cancer Recurrence between Laparoscopically Assisted and Open Colonic Resections due to Adenocarcinoma—A Single Centre Experience

Abstract: Background and objectives: When resecting colon adenocarcinoma, surgeons decide between the use of laparoscopically assisted and open surgery. Laparoscopic resection is known to have short-term benefits over an open operation. However, researchers are not as unified about the long-term findings. The aim of this research is to elaborate on five-year post-operative differences in survival and cancer recurrence between these two different approaches. Materials and methods: 74 enrolled patients were evaluated five… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

1
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 33 publications
1
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The examined clinical parameters of patients in our study after surgery were similar to recent reports [24]. Although the early diagnosis and treatment of CRC are in constant progress, the results of CRC patient treatment regarding postoperative recurrence and metastases, are unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…The examined clinical parameters of patients in our study after surgery were similar to recent reports [24]. Although the early diagnosis and treatment of CRC are in constant progress, the results of CRC patient treatment regarding postoperative recurrence and metastases, are unsatisfactory.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%