1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0301-6226(99)00073-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of a grazing- with an indoor-system of lamb fattening in Greece

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…T 3 group achieved comparatively lower weight gains than other treatment groups, indicated that extensive farming system has limited feeding resources and exposure to varied environmental conditions might have resulted in loss of body reserves for grazing activities which might have resulted in poor body weight gains. The results of the present study were in concurrence with the findings of (Zervas et al, 1999;Porwal et al, 2005 andBharambe andBurte, 2012) who reported higher body weight gains for the lambs reared under semi-intensive and intensive system of feeding when compared to extensive system. Carvalho et al, (2007) observed that increase in roughage with decrease in concentrate in the diets decreased the live weight gain of the lambs fed diets.…”
Section: Body Weight Gainsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…T 3 group achieved comparatively lower weight gains than other treatment groups, indicated that extensive farming system has limited feeding resources and exposure to varied environmental conditions might have resulted in loss of body reserves for grazing activities which might have resulted in poor body weight gains. The results of the present study were in concurrence with the findings of (Zervas et al, 1999;Porwal et al, 2005 andBharambe andBurte, 2012) who reported higher body weight gains for the lambs reared under semi-intensive and intensive system of feeding when compared to extensive system. Carvalho et al, (2007) observed that increase in roughage with decrease in concentrate in the diets decreased the live weight gain of the lambs fed diets.…”
Section: Body Weight Gainsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Higher plane of nutrition and efficient conversion into edible meat is the resultant effect of intensive system. Zervas et al, (1999) reported that, the carcass weight of lambs kept on pasture was lower, but omental and perinephric fat were significantly heavier in animals fed concentrate feed indoor. The meat: bone ratio was in the range of 1.89:1(T 3 ), 1.92:1(T 2 ) and 2.22:1 (T 1 ) indicated that significantly (p<0.05) higher percentage of meat weight obtained in intensive system.…”
Section: Body Condition Scores Of Deccani Lambs At Different Growth Smentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fanchone@antilles.inra.fr In the same way, in direct comparisons between animals fed indoors and animals fed at pasture, the animals fed indoors often received a high proportion of supplements, whereas animals at pasture did not (Keane and Allen, 1998;Zervas et al, 1999;Moniruzzaman et al, 2002;Raghuvansi et al, 2007). In addition, the forage on offer was not the same indoors and at pasture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As well known, meat quality of sheep is affected by breed, vegetation and feeding practices. Various aromatic compounds in natural vegetation during grazing may also affect the lamb meat quality (Kempt et al, 1981;Zervas et al, 1999;Özbey et al, 2000;Prioloa et al, 2002;Santos et al, 2008). It has been reported with previous studies (Esenbuğa et al, 2009;Yakan and Ünal, 2010) that there are important differences in animal feeding among geographical regions and even among districts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These approaches include methods of lamb fattening within the extensive production system, performed according to regional conditions that can also be called "traditional" or "local" conditions. Non-breeding male Chios lambs commonly raised in Ege Region reach slaughter weight in early ages under intensive feeding conditions (Economides et al, 1990;Altınel et al, 1998, Zervas et al, 1999. However for healthier meat production with sensory attributes based on the changing consumer demands, producers prefer traditional feeding methods in animal production (Oliván et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%