Comparison of a Smartfin with an Infrared Sea Surface Temperature Radiometer in the Atlantic Ocean

Abstract

The accuracy and precision of satellite sea surface temperature (SST) products in nearshore coastal waters are not well known, owing to a lack of in-situ data available for validation. It has been suggested that recreational watersports enthusiasts, who immerse themselves in nearshore coastal waters, be used as a platform to improve sampling and fill this gap. One tool that has been used worldwide by surfers is the Smartfin, which contains a temperature sensor integrated into a surfboard fin. If tools such as the Smartfin are to be considered for satellite validation work, they must be carefully evaluated against state-of-the-art techniques to quantify data quality. In this study, we developed a Simple Oceanographic floating Device (SOD), designed to float on the ocean surface, and deployed it during the 28th Atlantic Meridional Transect (AMT28) research cruise (September and October 2018). We attached a Smartfin to the underside of the SOD, which measured temperature at a depth of ∼0.1 m, in a manner consistent with how it collects data on a surfboard. Additional temperature sensors (an iButton and a TidbiT v2), shaded and positioned a depth of ∼1 m, were also attached to the SOD at some of the stations. Four laboratory comparisons of the SOD sensors (Smartfin, iButton and TidbiT v2) with an accurate temperature probe (±0.0043 K over a range of 273.15 to 323.15 K) were also conducted during the AMT28 voyage, over a temperature range of 290–309 K in a recirculating water bath. Mean differences (δ), referenced to the temperature probe, were removed from the iButton (δ=0.292 K) and a TidbiT v2 sensors (δ=0.089 K), but not from the Smartfin, as it was found to be in excellent agreement with the temperature probe (δ=0.005 K). The SOD was deployed for 20 min periods at 62 stations (predawn and noon) spanning 100 degrees latitude and a gradient in SST of 19 K. Simultaneous measurements of skin SST were collected using an Infrared Sea surface temperature Autonomous Radiometer (ISAR), a state-of-the-art instrument used for satellite validation. Additionally, we extracted simultaneous SST measurements, collected at slightly different depths, from an underway conductivity, temperature and depth (CTD) system. Over all 62 stations, the mean difference (δ) and mean absolute difference (ϵ) between Smartfin and the underway CTD were −0.01 and 0.06 K respectively (similar results obtained from comparisons between Smartfin and iButton and Smartfin and TidbiT v2), and the δ and ϵ between Smartfin and ISAR were 0.09 and 0.12 K respectively. In both comparisons, statistics varied between noon and predawn stations, with differences related to environmental variability (wind speed and sea-air temperature differences) and depth of sampling. Our results add confidence to the use of Smartfin as a citizen science tool for evaluating satellite SST data, and data collected using the SOD and ISAR were shown to be useful for quantifying near-surface temperature gradients.

Citizen scientists’ dive computers resolve seasonal and interannual temperature variations in the Red Sea

“…One approach is for citizen scientists to act as sensor platforms (Haklay, 2018), providing crowdsourced 'Volunteered Geographic Information' (VGI) (Schade et al, 2010) data for research purposes, such as data from a mobile phone or biosensing watch. Existing initiatives such as the Smartfin project (Brewin et al, 2017a;Brewin et al, 2021) and Sonic kayaks (Action, 2021) utilise sensor data collected from marine recreational activity. In the diving world, dive computers are as ubiquitous as smartphones.…”

Citizen Science Applications for Water Quality Monitoring. A Review

“…From the selected studies, a range of citizen science based methodologies are implemented, including crowd-sourced data collection through smartphone applications [9], [15], [20], [40], [55], [63], [70], [73], [75], participatory sampling campaigns (PSP) [13], [37] 675 based on conducting water quality sampling through utilization of airborne sensors including drones or placing sensors as part of other equipments used by professionals, and lastly community-based environmental monitoring (CBEM) programs [33], [38], [44] involving 680 the scientific data collection involving the participation of youth, elders, researchers, and experts.…”