2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.06.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of absolute and relative handgrip strength to predict cancer prognosis: A prospective multicenter cohort study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…27,28 However, it is interesting to find that overweight patients with CRC diagnosed with malnutrition according to the HGS-GLIM criteria had significantly lower OS and DFS rates than the respective control cohorts, whereas those diagnosed using the GLIM criteria alone did not. Recent studies have demonstrated the predictive value of HGS for a range of clinical outcomes, including mortality, postoperative complications, and long-term survival, 15,29,30 further supporting the utility of HGS measurements in clinical practice. In addition, the HGS-GLIM criteria were shown to be an independent risk factor for total complications, OS, and DFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…27,28 However, it is interesting to find that overweight patients with CRC diagnosed with malnutrition according to the HGS-GLIM criteria had significantly lower OS and DFS rates than the respective control cohorts, whereas those diagnosed using the GLIM criteria alone did not. Recent studies have demonstrated the predictive value of HGS for a range of clinical outcomes, including mortality, postoperative complications, and long-term survival, 15,29,30 further supporting the utility of HGS measurements in clinical practice. In addition, the HGS-GLIM criteria were shown to be an independent risk factor for total complications, OS, and DFS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Previous research has suggested that relative grip strength (rGS), defined as grip strength divided by body mass index, is more strongly associated with cardiometabolic disease biomarkers than absolute grip strength [ 15 ]. However, for predicting cancer outcomes, absolute grip strength has been found to be more effective than rGS [ 16 ]. Therefore, both rGS and absolute grip strength were used to assess samples’ muscle strength in this study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, dynamometry is a widely used method to assess muscle strength and functional capacity in patients with cancer [ 29 ]. The measurement of muscle strength using dynamometry has been proposed as a potential marker of malnutrition in these patients [ 30 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%