2000
DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-93.6.1796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of AC Electronic Monitoring and Field Data for Estimating Tolerance to <I>Empoasca kraemeri</I> (Homoptera: Cicadellidae) in Common Bean Genotypes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The Þndings described above strongly suggest that potato leafhopper resistance is not directly related to hopperburn resistance. We chose to test this hypothesis, as well as to more completely analyze the data, using PCA methods outlined in more detail in Serrano et al (2000). The hypothesis was supported by an initial PCA of all 10 variables, which loaded yellowing and stem growth reduction to widely different factors, and in directly opposite sign of those for leafhopper-affecting variables.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The Þndings described above strongly suggest that potato leafhopper resistance is not directly related to hopperburn resistance. We chose to test this hypothesis, as well as to more completely analyze the data, using PCA methods outlined in more detail in Serrano et al (2000). The hypothesis was supported by an initial PCA of all 10 variables, which loaded yellowing and stem growth reduction to widely different factors, and in directly opposite sign of those for leafhopper-affecting variables.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the general formula described in more detail in Serrano et al (2000), which in turn was developed from a yield-based resistance index formulated by bean breeders at Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Cali, Colombia. Our only modiÞcation (compared with Serrano et al 2000) is that we weighted each PCA factor score for importance in the overall index. Thus, Þrst each genotypeÕs mean score was multiplied by the percentage of the experimentÕs overall variance explained by that factor.…”
Section: Figmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both of these types of antixenosis and tolerance, respectively, already have been demonstrated in common bean varieties exposed to Empoasca leafhoppers (Serrano et al 2000), and also seem likely in alfalfa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…We suspect that two other mechanisms of reduced hopperburn are probably also occurring to a variable extent in all resistant genotypes: (1) additional, contact chemical compounds in the plant may prevent feeding by the leafhopper, or cause the insect to alter its feeding to a less hopperburn-causing type (Serrano et al 2000), and/or (2) physiological tolerance mechanisms of the plant may reduce the plant response (a "saliva-enhanced wound response" Backus 1995b, Ecale Zhou andBackus 1999]) that initiates hopperburn. Both of these types of antixenosis and tolerance, respectively, already have been demonstrated in common bean varieties exposed to Empoasca leafhoppers (Serrano et al 2000), and also seem likely in alfalfa.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feeding by an insect like M. scutellaris is very difficult to determine and quantify because stylet punctures can be microscopic and feeding is indistinguishable from probing unless sophisticated electronic monitoring is used (Serrano, Backus, and Cardona 2000). Therefore, our primary metric for determining host suitability was insect survival with nymph emergence, survival, and development providing secondary measures.…”
Section: Quarantine Host Range Testsmentioning
confidence: 99%