2014
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2014.1029.10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Accessions Conserved in Different Litchi Germplasm Collections Using Microsatellite Markers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the course of litchi’s dissemination to other countries, there has been considerable confusion regarding the identity of the original Chinese litchi cultivars, owing to misidentification or mislabeling, the corruption in the English transliteration of Chinese dialects, the replacement of the original Chinese names by local names, and the poor documentation of passport information during germplasm introduction [ 47 53 ]. Only comparisons with Chinese cultivars from their home ranges would help to ensure the correct identity of litchi collections in other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the course of litchi’s dissemination to other countries, there has been considerable confusion regarding the identity of the original Chinese litchi cultivars, owing to misidentification or mislabeling, the corruption in the English transliteration of Chinese dialects, the replacement of the original Chinese names by local names, and the poor documentation of passport information during germplasm introduction [ 47 53 ]. Only comparisons with Chinese cultivars from their home ranges would help to ensure the correct identity of litchi collections in other countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%