2019
DOI: 10.21569/2222-7415-2019-9-2-171-180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Accuracy of 2d- And 3d-Diagnostic Methods in Analysis of Maxillofacial Region for Cephalometry in Orthdontic Practice Based on Literature.

Abstract: urpose. To determine the orthodontic treatment relevance on the base of metaanalysis of the prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies, and to compare the accuracy of 2D and 3D cephalometry to detect them. Materials and methods. Comprehensive literature search on the prevalence of dentoalveolar anomalies and comparison of 2D-and 3D-cephalometry results was carried out using two databases. After the selection of the selected criteria, 46 articles on prevalence and 20 articles containing studies on the comparison of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The professional opinion shifts depending on the data, experience and evidence. After all, it was only a few years ago that some authors claimed that a lateral cephalogram is more precise and accurate than a 3D CBCT scan [66]. Nobody argues for that now.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Tools and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The professional opinion shifts depending on the data, experience and evidence. After all, it was only a few years ago that some authors claimed that a lateral cephalogram is more precise and accurate than a 3D CBCT scan [66]. Nobody argues for that now.…”
Section: Artificial Intelligence Tools and Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%