1987
DOI: 10.1159/000153737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Acid Phosphatase ACP1 Variants by Isoelectric Focusing and Conventional Electrophoresis: Identification of Three New Alleles, ACP1*N, ACP1*P and ACP1*S

Abstract: Three new alleles of human red cell acid phosphatase (ACP1) have been identified by comparison with previously reported variants using three different electrophoretic techniques. Family data are available on all the variants and show genetic transmission of the rare alleles ACP1*N, ACP1*P and ACP1*S. Further evidence of a rare allele demonstrating reversed ‘A’ activity is also described. The report documents the need to use several electrophoretic techniques to characterize new or rare variants.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As it was shown in previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the technique of IEF yields better electrophoretic separations than the con ventional starch gel electrophoresis. Each allele produces at least four isozymes dif fering in their isoelectric points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As it was shown in previous studies [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9], the technique of IEF yields better electrophoretic separations than the con ventional starch gel electrophoresis. Each allele produces at least four isozymes dif fering in their isoelectric points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…According to the pattern published by Miller et al [3], the ACPI H and ACPI KUK proteins may have similar IEF mo bilities, but they differ in their migrations after conventional starch gel electrophore sis (pH 5.9). The reverse 'A' variant also called the A' variant by Miller et al [3] does not appear to be identical with the ACPI * KUK variant because of their dif ferences in the two electrophoretic sys tems.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…GC was typed by isoelectric focusing (IEF) using the method described by Spitsyn and Titenko (1990). In addition, the following erythrocytic enzymes were typed by IEF: acid phosphatase 1 (ACP1) on an agarose gel using the method of Miller et al (1987); esterase D (ESD) on polyacrylamide gel after the method of Divall (1994). Both phosphoglucomutase-1 (PGM1) and superoxyddismutase-A (SOD-A) were phenotyped using IEF on the same polyacrylamide gels, following the method of Goedde et al (1981).…”
Section: Laboratory Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%