2016
DOI: 10.4103/2230-9748.216705
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of acoustic analysis of voice parameters in children with cochlear implants and normal hearing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This study aimed to compare the frequency parameters of voice in children using CI and those with normal hearing. The overall significance obtained in all parameters is in concurrence with findings of an earlier investigation by Srividhya et al 9 and Wang et al 14 They attributed these changes due to a lack of auditory feedback. The current study showed a significant difference between both groups in fundamental frequency values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This study aimed to compare the frequency parameters of voice in children using CI and those with normal hearing. The overall significance obtained in all parameters is in concurrence with findings of an earlier investigation by Srividhya et al 9 and Wang et al 14 They attributed these changes due to a lack of auditory feedback. The current study showed a significant difference between both groups in fundamental frequency values.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The vocal deviations that are prominently seen in individuals with hearing impairment include strain, breathiness, roughness, monotone, absence of rhythm, hoarseness, vocal fatigue, high pitch, reduced volume, and loudness with excessive variation; unbalanced resonance and imprecise articulation are essentially due to the lack of auditory monitoring of their own voice. 7 - 9 Hence, improving intelligible speech with an acceptable quality of voice is a challenge for speech therapists, even post-intervention due to the deprivation period. 10 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Srividya et al [ 10 ] compared voice parameters in 30 cochlear implant users and showed similar results with a statistically significant difference in the fundamental frequency of speech between both the groups. Group 1 with cochlear implant had a lower value of fundamental frequency (277.26 ± 47.88 Hz) as compared to normally hearing candidates (322.60 ± 60.19 Hz) in Group 2 (NH).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The literature suggests that due to poor auditory feedback, the children with profound or severe hearing loss have difficulty in controlling their pitch but children with cochlear implants after a period of speech training tend to have control over their pitch resulting in normal fundamental frequency range, but the range seems to be wider [ 3 , 10 , 11 ]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation