2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2015.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of actuator placement criteria for control of structures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Actuator location and shape are important design variables for feedback synthesis in active vibration control. Optimal actuator design improves performance of the controller and significantly reduces the cost of control [1], [2], [3]. In the engineering literature, the optimal actuator location problem has gained considerable interest, see [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actuator location and shape are important design variables for feedback synthesis in active vibration control. Optimal actuator design improves performance of the controller and significantly reduces the cost of control [1], [2], [3]. In the engineering literature, the optimal actuator location problem has gained considerable interest, see [4], [5], [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been analyzed that maximizing the minimum eigenvalue of the controllability gramian is not a useful criterion. Because the lower bound of the eigenvalue is zero, the minimum eigenvalue approaches zero as the dimension of approximation increases [26,27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of harvested electric energy, the level of electric potential generated on the electrodes, the controllability of a structure, the damping of vibration at the specified frequency, etc. [23,25,[27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37] can all play a role in the goals set.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%