2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.seta.2021.101472
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of adaptive filtering scheme for sustainable and efficient communication in smart city

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similarly, on the applied testing dataset, the OML-AMPDC algorithm has resulted in accuracy of 90.32%, precision of 91.55%, recall of 90.11%, and F-score of 90.21%. Overall comparative result analysis of the OML-AMPDC with recent methods is carried out in Table 2 [25][26][27]. Figure 13 illustrates the precision and recall analysis of the OML-AMPDC with existing techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similarly, on the applied testing dataset, the OML-AMPDC algorithm has resulted in accuracy of 90.32%, precision of 91.55%, recall of 90.11%, and F-score of 90.21%. Overall comparative result analysis of the OML-AMPDC with recent methods is carried out in Table 2 [25][26][27]. Figure 13 illustrates the precision and recall analysis of the OML-AMPDC with existing techniques.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Vimal et al [26] discuss different adaptive filtering schemes with comparisons between them in their paper. [27].…”
Section: 𝑒(π‘˜) = [𝑠(π‘˜) + π‘₯ 2 (π‘˜)] βˆ’ 𝑦(π‘˜)mentioning
confidence: 99%