2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.procir.2020.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Additively Manufactured vs. Conventional Maraging Steel in Corrosion-Fatigue Performance after various surface treatments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The life of most components and tools is related to abrasion on the surface, the occurrence of fatigue cracks and corrosion effects. All these influences begin to apply mainly from the surface of components, and that is why it is crucial to influence the mechanical and other properties of the surface area [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The life of most components and tools is related to abrasion on the surface, the occurrence of fatigue cracks and corrosion effects. All these influences begin to apply mainly from the surface of components, and that is why it is crucial to influence the mechanical and other properties of the surface area [1,2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have already established the high hardness in SLM components than their wrought equivalents. The difference was due to the fine cellular-dendritic network of SLM components compared to coarse-grained structures of their wrought counterparts (Bouzakis et al, 2020;Shindo et al, 2012;Stendal et al, 2018). In the present study, the high percentage change in the hardness of the wrought samples after the heat treatment can be explained as follows.…”
Section: Microhardness Analysismentioning
confidence: 64%
“…3 a). In general, the corrosion rates for AM are higher than for the CM samples due to the appearance of local stresses caused by the multiple melt cavities, the dendritic cellular structure and the increased roughness, which results in increased corrosion in these areas 53 . A comparison between the AM + SAT and CM + SAT samples shows the improved corrosion resistance of the conventionally produced material due to its better chemical homogeneity, particularly since pores are not present in such material.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%