2014
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/524/1/012125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of aerodynamic models for Vertical Axis Wind Turbines

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
56
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite this, the difference in power coefficient predicted by the AC, U2DiVA, and PW2DiVA remains small. These findings are in agreement with previous studies of Ferreira et al 30 Note that U2DiVA does take into account the dynamic effects while the other codes do not. The discontinuities in the vortex-model results (mainly downstream) are due to the interaction of the blades with the wake.…”
Section: Simulation Of the 2d Vawtsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Despite this, the difference in power coefficient predicted by the AC, U2DiVA, and PW2DiVA remains small. These findings are in agreement with previous studies of Ferreira et al 30 Note that U2DiVA does take into account the dynamic effects while the other codes do not. The discontinuities in the vortex-model results (mainly downstream) are due to the interaction of the blades with the wake.…”
Section: Simulation Of the 2d Vawtsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…However, some discrepancies appear, for instance the vortex method does not show the bump around 270 o . Few aerodynamic models for VAWTs, such as the Actuator Cylinder flow model, predict this bump (see Ferreira et al, [12]). In addition, the stall model is the only one to reproduce the high increase of tangential forces at downwind positions.…”
Section: Coupled Lbm/alm Vertical Axis Wind Turbinementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shi et al [78] used a 2D vortex type free wake aerodynamic model and solved a Poisson equation for the 'weak induced' pressure field to overcome the potential function for the wake vorticity field. A comparison between the Momentum, Vortex and Panel methods has been made by the Ferreira et al [79] in 2014. He claimed that the streamtube model deviate significantly from the other models, and results showed a good agreement between the Vortex and Panel methods.…”
Section: Direct Design Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%