2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2016.09.070
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Aeroelastic Modeling and Robust Flutter Analysis of a Typical Section**This work has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 636307, project FLEXOP

Abstract: General rightsThis document is made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the reference above. uk ).Abstract: A comparison of robust flutter analyses within the µ framework is presented. The chosen test bed is the typical section with unsteady aerodynamic loads, which enables basic modeling features to be captured and so extend the gained knowledge to practical problems treated with modern techniques. The two main approaches to pose the LFT problem are i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 11 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A publicly available dataset [42] is used, which includes sensor data from three different fishing ships for a period of one month. This data has been used in Work Package (WP) 3 of DataBio project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 732064.…”
Section: Dataset and Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A publicly available dataset [42] is used, which includes sensor data from three different fishing ships for a period of one month. This data has been used in Work Package (WP) 3 of DataBio project, which has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement No 732064.…”
Section: Dataset and Taskmentioning
confidence: 99%