Comparison of agricultural subsidies in the Czech Republic and in the selected states of the European Union

Střeleček, F.; Zdeněk, Radek; Lososová, Jana

doi:10.17221/68/2009-agricecon

Cited by 27 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 17 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It is usual to analyze the employment (Bielik, Rajčániová, 2008;Riguelle et al, 2007;Blien, Wolf, 2002;Dinc, Haynes, 1999), the added value (Esteban, 2000), labour productivity (Maudos et al, 2008) or other (Střeleček et al, 2009) as an analysed variable. Berzeg (1978) and Knudsen (2000) based the analysis on the model of relative change analysis.…”

Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the land rent among EU countries

Lososová¹,

Zdeněk²,

Kopta³

2013

Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Materials and Methodologymentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the land rent among EU countries

Lososová¹,

Zdeněk²,

Kopta³

2013

Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendelianae Brun.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In our later research, we are arriving at the conclusion that the lower agriculture performance of the new EU countries is caused mainly by the lower use of the fixed and variable assets and a lower effectiveness of their utilisation (Grznár 2014). Střeleček et al (2009) by means of the shift-share analysis, evaluate the influence of the supports/subsidies in agriculture and of the structure of agricultural production on incomes of businesses, while comparing the Czech Republic, Poland, Germany, and the Great Britain. They conclude that the Czech agriculture is competitive, because it has lower subsidies at lower costs.…”

Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning

confidence: 99%

Agriculture in the EU and position of the Slovak Republic

Szabo¹,

Grznár²

2015

AGR ECON-CZECH

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Th e paper analyses disparity in the performance of farms in the EU countries and identifi es their causes. Th e individual countries are ranked in the paper according to the long-term average of the amount of their agricultural produce per unit of area into seven segments, and the relation between the input of fi xed assets, intermediate consumption, labour force, levels of animals, and other aspects are identifi ed for the creation of agricultural production. In terms of its performance, the Slovak agriculture ranks in the last but one seventh segment and in comparison with the advanced countries, it shows a low input of fi xed assets, intermediate product, livestock units, but also a lower volume of the provided subsidies than the advanced countries. Th e Slovak agriculture does not make use of its competitive advantages, which involve mainly the size of businesses, the economies of scale, and the productivity of labour.

show abstract

“…In this study, it is determined that the lower percentages of support level weaken the competitiveness of agricultural area, and the regeneration and modernization of agriculture. As a result, it is concluded that the subsidies which are applied according to type of production might affect the production diversity (Střeleček et al, 2009). A Premium support system is an alternative support model that can be applied by assuring stability in the sense of prices and the producer in agriculture of Turkey, depending on the research work of Sahinoz et al (2007).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

The effects of agricultural subsidies applied in Turkey on sunflower cultivation area and the producers income

Semerci¹

2013

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Sunflower takes an important place in terms of raw materials provided for the oil industry and of added value, as well as bring-in income for producers in Turkey's economy. Sunflower is an important source of income by standing the main product in alternation of the wheat in the sense of manufacturers in Thrace Region which constitutes the European part of Turkey. In this study, the effect of premium support application on sunflower cultivation area and production amount in Thrace where approximately 65% of sunflower production in Turkey is met and also the effect of support payments on producer income are investigated. In this study, it is concluded that premium supports are inefficient in increasing sunflower cultivation area and production whereas it is concluded that it has an important role on producer income and on the determination of the market price. In fact, from a survey that was carried out, it emerges that the area-based support (diesel oil, fertilizer etc. support) together with premium support increase the revenue of sunflower up to 27.74% per area unit and the gross profit in proportion to 98.87%. This study indicates that in order to increase the sunflower production in Turkey the amounts of sunflower premium support, diesel oil and fertilizer should be rearranged in compliance with current market conditions. Moreover, as well as for other agricultural products, the use of certified seed should also be included into agricultural support programmes, production on well irrigated areas should be widened and the use of oil crops varieties with high oil ratio should be extended.

show abstract

Comparison of agricultural subsidies in the Czech Republic and in the selected states of the European Union

Cited by 27 publications

References 17 publications

Differences in the land rent among EU countries

Differences in the land rent among EU countries

Agriculture in the EU and position of the Slovak Republic

The effects of agricultural subsidies applied in Turkey on sunflower cultivation area and the producers income

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About