2011
DOI: 10.1364/ao.50.003389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of algorithms used for optical characterization of multilayer optical coatings

Abstract: Two algorithms used for the on-line and off-line characterization of multilayer optical coatings are experimentally compared using test samples produced by two different deposition processes and different monitoring approaches. One of these algorithms, called the triangular algorithm, demonstrates its superiority in all considered situations. We performed experiments with multilayer samples formed by high-density thin films, which allowed us to neglect possible errors in the film refractive indices and concent… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Refractive indices of Ta 2 O 5 and SiO 2 thin-film materials have been found with high accuracy and verified using reliable results of the previous studies [23,24]. This allows us to neglect possible small offsets in layer refractive indices and to attribute the observed deviations to errors in layer thicknesses.…”
Section: Error Analysis and Reverse Engineering For Accurate Determinsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Refractive indices of Ta 2 O 5 and SiO 2 thin-film materials have been found with high accuracy and verified using reliable results of the previous studies [23,24]. This allows us to neglect possible small offsets in layer refractive indices and to attribute the observed deviations to errors in layer thicknesses.…”
Section: Error Analysis and Reverse Engineering For Accurate Determinsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Refractive indices of Ta 2 O 5 and SiO 2 thin-film materials have been found with a high accuracy and verified using reliable results of the previous studies [17,18]. This allows us to neglect possible small offsets in layer refractive indices and to attribute the observed deviations to errors in layer thicknesses.…”
Section: Reverse Engineering and Re-deposition With Modified Monitorisupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Employing a needle algorithm the subsequent layers can be optimized with respect to the specified group delay dispersion and reflection target values. An optimization cycle can be performed in situ after every coated layer [10]. Especially taking into account the extreme sensitivity of the designed GDD to deposition errors in the last layers, the conventional BBM is used for layer termination until the fifth last layer of the design is finished.…”
Section: Deposition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%