1972
DOI: 10.1093/jaoac/55.3.636
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Aliquot and Complete Sample Procedure for the Determination of Nicotine in Cigarette Smoke

Abstract: Two methods for determination of nicotine in cigarette smoke have been compared : distillation of a complete sample vs. distillation of an aliquot. For the evaluation of these methods, monitor cigarettes or cigarettes from cartons with the same packing codes purchased from a local store were used for each test set. The cigarettes were conditioned, selected, and smoked according to the official method published by the Federal Trade Commission. Because both isopropanol and dioxane are used as solvents, tests wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…CSC was prepared using the University of Kentucky Reference 3R4F Cigarettes as previously described [ 38 ]. Briefly, the particulate phase of smoke was collected on Cambridge filters using a 30-port smoking machine (Borgwaldt) under standard Federal Trade Commission conditions, [ 54 ] dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 40 μg/ul, and stored in small aliquots at -80°C. At the time of use, aliquots were thawed in a 37°C water bath and discarded after use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CSC was prepared using the University of Kentucky Reference 3R4F Cigarettes as previously described [ 38 ]. Briefly, the particulate phase of smoke was collected on Cambridge filters using a 30-port smoking machine (Borgwaldt) under standard Federal Trade Commission conditions, [ 54 ] dissolved in DMSO at a concentration of 40 μg/ul, and stored in small aliquots at -80°C. At the time of use, aliquots were thawed in a 37°C water bath and discarded after use.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine yield of carbon monoxide The amount of CO formed and tar content of each cigarette type were determined under the experimental conditions under FTC conditions, reported in detail elsewhere [14], carried out at Philip Morris Product Testing Laboratories (Richmond, VA, USA). Briefly, cigarettes were smoked in a Filtrona/Cerulean Smoking Machine (Cerulean Corp., Richmond, VA, USA), models 400-450, equipped with harmonized smoking hood and CO analyser.The standard test protocol was used utilizing 35 ml puff volume over a 2-s puff duration collected every 60 s. CO was analysed in the mainstream smoke by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy connected to the smoke machine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Machine yield of carbon monoxide The amount of CO formed and tar content of each cigarette type were determined under the experimental conditions under FTC conditions, reported in detail elsewhere [14], carried out at Philip Morris Product Testing Laboratories (Richmond, VA, USA). Briefly, cigarettes were smoked in a Filtrona/Cerulean Smoking Machine (Cerulean Corp., Richmond, VA, USA), models 400‐450, equipped with harmonized smoking hood and CO analyser.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CSC was prepared from the University of Kentucky Reference Cigarette 1R4F (9 mg tar and 0.8 mg nicotine/cigarette). The 'tar' or particulate phase of smoke was collected on a Cambridge filter pad from cigarettes using a smoking machine set to a 35 ml puff vol of 2 s duration under standard conditions prescribed by Federal Trade Commission (14). The smoke particulate matter was dissolved in DMSO at 40 mg/ml, aliquoted into small vials and stored frozen at -80°C.…”
Section: Preparation Of Cscmentioning
confidence: 99%