[a] 1Introduction Screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) are electrochemical sensors that are expected to be widely used in numerous real-lifea pplications such as biology,m edicine, environmentalp rotection, and electronics.T hanks to mass productiona nd relatively low cost, SPEs can be disposed of after as ingle use.M oreover,i ntegrated screen-printed electrodes comprising 3-electrodes on one strip require smaller amounts of samples,w hich decreasest he volume of the solutions used and the waste generated.B efore the application of the SPE in voltammetric analysis its surface is frequently modified with additional layers, resulting in improved its performance.I nt he last 15 years,n onmercury modifications of voltammetric electrodesh ave become widespread. Bi [1][2][3][4][5][6][7],S b[ 8-10],S n [ 11,12],P b [13,14] and other metal films deposited on different supports have found wide application in electroanalytical practicea sn on-toxic or less toxic alternativest om ercury electrodes.Taking into account the fact that the median lethal dose (LD50) values for water-soluble acetatesa re equal to 40 mg/kg for Hg(II), 4665 mg/kgf or Pb(II), and 5000 mg/kg for Bi(III), it may be concluded that the toxicity of Pb(II)a nd Bi(III) is ca. two orders of magnitude lower than that of Hg(II) [15].T hesee lectrodes have mostly been utilized for the anodic stripping voltammetric determination of Pb,C d, Zn, Tl;h owever, cases of adsorptives tripping voltammetric (AdSV) quantification of some metals,m ostly Ni and Co,a tt hese film electrodes have also been reported [6,13,14,16,17].I np articular, lead film electrodes deposited in-situ at the glassy carbon (GC) support offer outstanding performance in terms of selectivity and sensitivity in AdSV determinationo fs ome metals,s uch as Ni, Co [13,14,[18][19][20] TheA dSVp rocedures utilizingt he dioximate complexes belong to the most sensitivea nd selective analytical methodso fC oa nd Ni determination [ 6,24].A mong them, the method with dimethylglyoxime (DMG) is commonly used as the standard procedure [25,26].H owever, in the case of Co,t he AdSV method with nioxime [27], and especially its catalytic version with nioximea nd nitrite [6,24,[28][29][30][31][32],a ppear to be the mosts ensitive.I ndependently of the voltammetric mode used, the AdSV response of Co(II) in the presence of nioximei st wo to five times highert han that for DMG [27,28].T herefore,t he nioximel igand proved to be very effective for the quantificationo fu ltratrace levels of Co in ocean water using AdSV [27] and catalytic AdSV in variousm aterials at the mercurya nd otherm etallicf ilm electrodes [6,18,19,24,[28][29][30][31][32].I ts hould also be mentioned that Baars and Croot have recently founda nother extremely sensitive CAdSV method of Co(II) determination exploiting bromate instead of nitrite as an oxidant [ 33,34].T hey observed that the catalytic enhancement was much higher for DMG than for the nioximel igand.H ence,t he highest sensitivity of the CAdSV procedure of Co(II) determination may be re...