2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2016.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of alternative flue gas dry treatment technologies in waste-to-energy processes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These concentration values were selected as representative of the HCl and SO 2 content in flue gas generated by municipal or hazardous waste incinerators. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These concentration values were selected as representative of the HCl and SO 2 content in flue gas generated by municipal or hazardous waste incinerators. ,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Air pollution control (APC) systems for MSWI have improved significantly since the advent of WtE. SO 2 and HCl removal can reach nearly 100% through wet and semi-dry scrubbing (Dal Pozzo et al, 2016). NO x removal technologies include mostly selective catalytic reduction (SCR) and selective non-catalytic reduction (SNCR).…”
Section: Msw Suitability For Specific Wte Thermochemical Technologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sorbent suppliers and technology providers rarely disclose their data in the open literature [71], while scholarly studies mainly report results of laboratory-scale tests of little applicability to full-scale systems [72,73]. The second issue is related to the high variability of the composition of processed waste, which may result in significant fluctuation of HCl concentrations in the gases to be treated [74,75], hence the sensitivity of the LCI results to these parameters need to be thoughtfully checked. Being the relationship between removal efficiency and sorbent feed rate non-linear [76], process modeling is required for a correct evaluation of both aspects.…”
Section: Use Of Alternative Sorbents For Acid Gas Removal In Waste-tomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Process modeling was based on the empirical reaction model described by Dal Pozzo et al [74], calibrated on a set of process data from operating plants and expressing the non-linear relationship between the over-stoichiometric ratio (SR) of reactant fed to the system and the obtained acid gas conversion. The non-linear model linking SR and X for the Ca-based and the Na-based stages is shown in Figure 5, alongside the process data from the reference plant adopted for model calibration.…”
Section: Equipmentmentioning
confidence: 99%