2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.09.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of alternative interpretive criteria for the HIV-1 Western blot and results of the Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 Rapid Test for classifying HIV-1 and HIV-2 infections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
26
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
(20 reference statements)
2
26
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Further, in our study, the alternative algorithm correctly identified the HIV infection status among all HIV-1 western blotpositives, highlighting its utility in a variety of settings in the USA. In addition, even though HIV-2 is rare in the USA [26], the alternative algorithm identified HIV-2 infections that would otherwise have been misclassified as HIV-1 infections by the HIV-1 western blot, as has been noted in other studies [10,27]. With the availability of supplemental testing technologies that differentiate HIV-1 from HIV-2 and widespread use of the alternative algorithm, it is likely that more HIV-2 infections will be recognized.…”
Section: Number Of Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Further, in our study, the alternative algorithm correctly identified the HIV infection status among all HIV-1 western blotpositives, highlighting its utility in a variety of settings in the USA. In addition, even though HIV-2 is rare in the USA [26], the alternative algorithm identified HIV-2 infections that would otherwise have been misclassified as HIV-1 infections by the HIV-1 western blot, as has been noted in other studies [10,27]. With the availability of supplemental testing technologies that differentiate HIV-1 from HIV-2 and widespread use of the alternative algorithm, it is likely that more HIV-2 infections will be recognized.…”
Section: Number Of Specimensmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2010, an alternative laboratory HIV diagnostic testing algorithm was proposed [6] ( Fig. 1) that is designed to detect early infections, reduce indeterminate results, and identify HIV-2 infections [7][8][9][10]. The alternative diagnostic algorithm involves screening with a sensitive fourth-generation antigen/ antibody HIV-1/2 immunoassay, or if unavailable, a third-generation HIV-1/2 immunoassay.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous studies document that high levels of HIV-1 RNA are present in persons with acute HIV infections that are detected by sensitive immunoassays but negative or indeterminate by Western blot [43•, 44-49]. Because of cross-reactivity, the HIV-1 Western blot was interpreted as positive for HIV-1 in 46 to 85 % of specimens from persons found to be infected with HIV-2, resulting in incorrect or delayed diagnosis [50][51][52]. Although HIV-2 remains uncommon in the USA, accurate diagnosis of HIV-2 is clinically important because some antiretroviral agents effective against HIV-1 (including non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and some protease inhibitors) are not effective against HIV-2 [53,54].…”
Section: Clinical and Public Health Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New developments also occur faster than evidence-based recommendations can be written. Ample evidence demonstrated that the FDA-approved Multispot HIV-1/HIV-2 differentiation assay provided results superior to those of the HIV-1 Western blot when used as a supplemental test [45,52,[79][80][81][82][83]. However, because it was approved only for HIV antibody screening, it could not be recommended as a supplemental test in diagnostic algorithms until the manufacturer obtained FDA approval for this intended use [84].…”
Section: The Three-legged Racementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently available HIV-1/2 diagnostic 3rd-generation enzyme immunoassays (EIAs) or 4th-generation EIAs and chemiluminescence microparticle immunoassays (CMIAs) do not distinguish between HIV-1 and HIV-2 antibodies and the confirmatory HIV-1 Western Blot (WB) assay may misclassify HIV-2 infection as HIV-1 due to antibody cross-reactivity [7]. Thus, an efficient and rapid supplemental orthogonal serologic method is required to differentiate HIV-2 from HIV-1 infection [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%