Comparison of Analytic Methods for Quantitative Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction Data

Abstract

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) is a laboratory procedure to amplify and simultaneously quantify targeted DNA molecules, and then detect the product of the reaction at the end of all the amplification cycles. A more modern technique, real-time PCR, also known as quantitative PCR (qPCR), detects the product after each cycle of the progressing reaction by applying a specific fluorescence technique. The quantitative methods currently used to analyze qPCR data result in varying levels of estimation quality. This study compares the accuracy and precision of the estimation achieved by eight different models when applied to the same qPCR dataset. Also, the study evaluates a newly introduced data preprocessing approach, the taking-the-difference approach, and compares it to the currently used approach of subtracting the background fluorescence. The taking-the-difference method subtracts the fluorescence in the former cycle from that in the latter cycle to avoid estimating the background fluorescence. The results obtained from the eight models show that taking-the-difference is a better way to preprocess qPCR data compared to the original approach because of a reduction in the background estimation error. The results also show that weighted models are better than non-weighted models, and that the precision of the estimation achieved by the mixed models is slightly better than that achieved by the linear regression models.

rRT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2: Analytical considerations

“…This type of error causes to falsely increase the CT of the curves with low concentration of RNA or cDNA. There is a possibility of pattern destruction, which is usually due to frequent freezing and thawing of standards or use of very low concentration patterns [23] , [54] .…”

Affine analysis for quantitative PCR measurements

“…been separated into different wells. 5 Because both the initial template copy and reagent numbers are partitioned into these sub-samples, the linearity assumption amounts to the mathematical statement that…”

“…Ref. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13] and the references therein) have treated analysis of qPCR data as a task in mathematical modeling, wherein parameterized equations are assumed to fully describe the signal shape. While such approaches can be powerful tools for elucidating the mechanisms driving PCR reactions, they invariably introduce model-form errors, i.e.…”

maxRatio improves the detection of samples with abnormal amplification profiles on QIAgen’s artus HIV-1 qPCR assay

“…qPCR data are usually analyzed by the fit-point (FP) method, which assumes equal amplification efficiency between samples 5 . However, anomalies in the background fluorescence at low template input, can affect the quantification [6][7][8] . An alternative method, maxRatio, was introduced to overcome these issues 9 .…”