2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.nicl.2023.103436
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of anatomical-based vs. nTMS-based risk stratification model for predicting postoperative motor outcome and extent of resection in brain tumor surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 36 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Multiple studies have shown the potential of nTMS in monitoring and predicting functional recovery after functional-eloquent brain surgery [ 9 , 23 ]. Ivren et al [ 24 ] found that nTMS was able to predict the recovery of motor function in patients who underwent surgery for high-grade gliomas associated with the motor cortex (M1) or the corticospinal tract (CST). The study compared the results of nTMS with the results of clinical tests and found that nTMS was more sensitive in predicting the recovery of motor function [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple studies have shown the potential of nTMS in monitoring and predicting functional recovery after functional-eloquent brain surgery [ 9 , 23 ]. Ivren et al [ 24 ] found that nTMS was able to predict the recovery of motor function in patients who underwent surgery for high-grade gliomas associated with the motor cortex (M1) or the corticospinal tract (CST). The study compared the results of nTMS with the results of clinical tests and found that nTMS was more sensitive in predicting the recovery of motor function [ 24 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%