2020
DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10015-1733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Herbal Root Canal Irrigants (Azadirachta indica, Morinda citrifolia) against Enterococcus faecalis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Afshan et al concluded that neem extract shows better inhibition than M. citrifolia against E. faecalis . 31 Lakshmi et al concluded that both aqueous and ethanolic neem extract shows better antimicrobial property that inhibits E. faecalis in root canal failure and is a better alternative for NaOCl. 10 A study by Prashanth et al concluded that the maximum antibacterial activity of neem extract at 50% against Streptococcus mutans .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Afshan et al concluded that neem extract shows better inhibition than M. citrifolia against E. faecalis . 31 Lakshmi et al concluded that both aqueous and ethanolic neem extract shows better antimicrobial property that inhibits E. faecalis in root canal failure and is a better alternative for NaOCl. 10 A study by Prashanth et al concluded that the maximum antibacterial activity of neem extract at 50% against Streptococcus mutans .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be used as an effective substitute for sodium hypochlorite due to its high biocompatibility [15]. However, the major disadvantage of neem is its pungent taste, which reduces the patient's acceptance and can be neutralized by adding sweeteners [16]. Although neem has an efficient antimicrobial effect on many microbes, different studies have mentioned that neem has limited action against the main microbes in root canal infections like E. faecalis and candida albicans [17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%