2020
DOI: 10.1007/s42452-020-03767-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of artificial neural networks (ANN), support vector machine (SVM) and gene expression programming (GEP) approaches for predicting TBM penetration rate

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They reported that the ANN and SVM techniques produced more accurate models than the MLR technique. A slightly higher accuracy of the ANN model (R = 0.99) when compared to SVM (R = 0.97) was reported by Afradi and Ebrahimabadi [47] who used AI methods to predict the penetration rate of tunnel boring machine. Sabzi-Nojadeh et al [48] compared the accuracy of ANN and MLR models used to predict the oil yield and trans-anethole yield of fennel populations; ANN performed better (R = 0.96 and R = 0.88) than MLR (R = 0.74 and R = 0.68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported that the ANN and SVM techniques produced more accurate models than the MLR technique. A slightly higher accuracy of the ANN model (R = 0.99) when compared to SVM (R = 0.97) was reported by Afradi and Ebrahimabadi [47] who used AI methods to predict the penetration rate of tunnel boring machine. Sabzi-Nojadeh et al [48] compared the accuracy of ANN and MLR models used to predict the oil yield and trans-anethole yield of fennel populations; ANN performed better (R = 0.96 and R = 0.88) than MLR (R = 0.74 and R = 0.68).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…− deformation at the breaking point (λ) 7.83 ± 1. 47 Statistical data are expressed as means ± SD. Means in a column followed by different letters show significant differences (α = 0.05) according to the LSD test.…”
Section: Mechanical Properties Of Cranberry Fruitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Support Vector Machine (SVM) is a widely adopted classifier that achieves sample classification by identifying separating hyperplanes. In this experiment, SVM serves as the foundation for training the classification of wool fiber texture features [10]. Moreover, to address the intricacies of sample classification, a kernel function is introduced during the actual classification process.…”
Section: Intelligent Recognition Of Wool Fibersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Over time, for optimizing the nonlinear problems, the ML models, including the support vector machine (SVM), have been utilized in numerous fields such as for predicting the penetration rate of tunnel-boring machines [33], solar radiation prediction [34], streamflow forecasting [35], landslide hazard modelling [36][37][38], seawater level simulation [39], forecasting electric load [40], and infiltration simulation [41,42]. The SVM approach was recommended by Vapnik [43] and derived from statistical learning theory to solve classification and regression problems [44].…”
Section: Support Vector Machinementioning
confidence: 99%