1987
DOI: 10.1042/bj2420097
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of arylsulphatases from Eimeria tenella (parasite) and chicken caecum (host)

Abstract: Chicken caecal arylsulphatase was purified 700-fold by (NH4)2SO4 fractionation, concanavalin A-Sepharose and cyclic AMP-Sepharose chromatographies. The purified enzyme was a glycoprotein of Mr 97,000. It hydrolysed p-nitrocatechol sulphate, cerebroside 3-sulphate and ascorbic acid 2-sulphate and was strongly inhibited by Na2SO4 (Ki = 50 microM) and Na3PO4 (Ki = 20 microM). Arylsulphatase from Eimeria tenella sporozoites was purified 28-fold by (NH4)2SO4 fractionation. Arylsulphatase of E. tenella sporozoites w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1988
1988
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 42 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sulfate binding. The inhibition of the phosphatase superfamily by secondary products (sulfate and phosphate) has been well documented (Farooqui & Hanson, 1987;Ueki et al, 1995;. Sulfate slightly decreased the activity of the partially purified Aspergillus and Penicillium COSe enzymes Segel & Johnson, 1963), but was reported not to inhibit Pseudomonas COSe (up to 30 mM; Takebe, 1961) 3a and 4a), most likely arising from the high concentrations of sulfate used in the crystallization conditions (1 M ammonium sulfate; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Overall Analysis Of Smecose Structuresmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Sulfate binding. The inhibition of the phosphatase superfamily by secondary products (sulfate and phosphate) has been well documented (Farooqui & Hanson, 1987;Ueki et al, 1995;. Sulfate slightly decreased the activity of the partially purified Aspergillus and Penicillium COSe enzymes Segel & Johnson, 1963), but was reported not to inhibit Pseudomonas COSe (up to 30 mM; Takebe, 1961) 3a and 4a), most likely arising from the high concentrations of sulfate used in the crystallization conditions (1 M ammonium sulfate; Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Overall Analysis Of Smecose Structuresmentioning
confidence: 98%