2001
DOI: 10.1001/archpedi.155.1.50
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Auscultatory and Oscillometric Blood Pressures

Abstract: These findings preclude the interchange of readings by the 2 methods. Caution must be exercised in the diagnosis of hypertension when an automated device is used.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
74
1
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(84 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
5
74
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Another factor that might have affected the levels of measured BP in this study is the use of an automated electronic manometre for office BP measurement instead of a conventional mercury sphygmomanometre and the auscultatory technique as recommended by the 2004 Task Force. 14 This device has been validated in adults, 11 yet differences in measured BP compared 12 Although, there are reports that some of the oscillometric devices might overestimate BP in children, 19,20 the validation study by Wong et al 12 suggests that the Welch Allyn Vital Sign Monitor device tends to underestimate BP (by 4.4 mm Hg for systolic and 4.1 mm Hg for diastolic BP). These results are in favour of excluding an overestimating factor in our study, attributable to the device used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…18 Another factor that might have affected the levels of measured BP in this study is the use of an automated electronic manometre for office BP measurement instead of a conventional mercury sphygmomanometre and the auscultatory technique as recommended by the 2004 Task Force. 14 This device has been validated in adults, 11 yet differences in measured BP compared 12 Although, there are reports that some of the oscillometric devices might overestimate BP in children, 19,20 the validation study by Wong et al 12 suggests that the Welch Allyn Vital Sign Monitor device tends to underestimate BP (by 4.4 mm Hg for systolic and 4.1 mm Hg for diastolic BP). These results are in favour of excluding an overestimating factor in our study, attributable to the device used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indications for BP measurement and investigations for hypertension concern preterm neonates born with concomitant congenital malformations and diseases associated with hypertension and newborns requiring hospitalization. It is recommended to perform BP measurements in appropriate www.ah.viamedica.pl [126] conditions and using the technique described in Table XVIII [129][130][131][132][133][134][135]. In neonates, infants and young children, auscultatory measurement is not recommended due to technical difficulties and a high prevalence of the white coat effect compared to automatic measurement.…”
Section: Neonatal Hypertensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Blood pressure and HR were measured by a single determination obtained through an automated oscillometric device. Although automated blood pressure devices reduce observer bias, they tend to report blood pressure values 4-12 mmHg higher than blood pressure obtained by the auscultatory method (Park et al 2001;Park et al 2005).…”
Section: Study Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%