2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1231-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of axitinib and sunitinib as first-line therapies for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a real-world multicenter analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The clinical outcomes of these patients were reported, and prognostic factors for these patients were elucidated. The median OS of all patients was 65.0 months, which was comparable with the findings of subgroup analysis in a pivotal study on sunitinib 10 and a first-line axitinib regimen 7 in Japanese patients with mRCC. In addition, we identified CRP expression level as a potential prognostic factors of PFS and poor IMDC risk score and spindle histology as potential prognostic factors of OS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The clinical outcomes of these patients were reported, and prognostic factors for these patients were elucidated. The median OS of all patients was 65.0 months, which was comparable with the findings of subgroup analysis in a pivotal study on sunitinib 10 and a first-line axitinib regimen 7 in Japanese patients with mRCC. In addition, we identified CRP expression level as a potential prognostic factors of PFS and poor IMDC risk score and spindle histology as potential prognostic factors of OS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This distinctive characteristic might allow for the same or better clinical outcomes as well as effective first-line therapy, although axitinib has not demonstrated improved prognosis over that of sorafenib in first-line settings 6 . In contrast, axitinib has resulted in superior clinical outcomes, in terms of both survival and safety profile, compared to those of sunitinib in a real-world retrospective cohort 7 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Our database did not include the patients treated with the first‐line pazopanib. Conversely, we used axitinib as the first‐line therapy for elderly or frail patients, because it has more feasible safety profiles on hematological toxicity than sunitinib and on the liver toxicity than pazopanib . Furthermore, a lack of NLR data prevents comparing the predictive ability of CAR with NLR.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, molecular-targeted therapies have been generally used for treatment of mRCC. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] As prognoses in mRCC have improved, more precise stratifications based on risk factors have been required. In the molecular-targeted therapy era, the IMDC risk classification is a standard riskbased stratification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation