2020
DOI: 10.1088/1742-6596/1544/1/012196
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Backbones for Semantic Segmentation Network

Abstract: As for the classification network that is constantly emerging with each passing day, different classification network as the backbone of the semantic segmentation network may show different performance. This paper selected the road extraction data set of CVPR DeepGlobe, and compared the performance differences of VGG-16 as the backbone of Unet, ResNet34, ResNet101 and Xception as the backbone of AD-LinkNet. When VGG-16 is used as the backbone of the semantic segmentation network, it performs better in the face… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, only U-Net was used among the CNN architectures, but regional performance comparisons with other CNN models are essential for the normalization regional performance differences [32]. We will conduct investigations to quantify and examine regional performance differences according to the architecture by using more advanced architectures such as the ResNet [33], GoogLeNet [34], and AlexNet [35] series in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, only U-Net was used among the CNN architectures, but regional performance comparisons with other CNN models are essential for the normalization regional performance differences [32]. We will conduct investigations to quantify and examine regional performance differences according to the architecture by using more advanced architectures such as the ResNet [33], GoogLeNet [34], and AlexNet [35] series in the future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, botanists showed interest to apply up-to-date DL in HTPP data analysis ( Jiang and Li, 2020 ). The encoder and decoder portions of U-Net ( Figure 1E ) showed several performances in various environments ( Zhang et al, 2020 ). The encoder provides valuable information on whether various encoders at U-Net yield different results for interesting traits (PA) in agriculture ( Jiang and Li, 2020 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second half of the architecture, the decoder, uses features from the previous step. For separating object and background information, advanced encoders gather additional features from images and achieve higher accuracies ( Hoeser and Kuenzer, 2020 ; Zhang et al, 2020 ). Hence, for segmenting, there is room for improvement because U-Net performs well in different soil conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper, we will compare the advantages and disadvantages of various classical basic classification networks as backbones through experiments [23].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%