2011
DOI: 10.4238/2011.december.8.8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bacterial communities in the Solimões and Negro River tributaries of the Amazon River based on small subunit rRNA gene sequences

Abstract: ABSTRACT. The microbiota of the Amazon River basin has been little studied. We compared the structure of bacterial communities of the Solimões and Negro Rivers, the main Amazon River tributaries, based on analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences. Water was sampled with a 3-L Van Dorn collection bottle; samples were collected at nine different points/depths totaling 27 L of water from each river. Total DNA was extracted from biomass retained by a 0.22-μm filter after sequential filtration of the water through 0.8-an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
5
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria dominated all river communities, but the Amazon and Tapajós rivers had higher proportions of Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Nitrospirae, and Deltaproteobacteria than other rivers, and a much lower proportion of Flavobacteriia and other Bacteroidetes ( Figure 5B ). Bacteroidetes were detected in the tropical Paraná River, but these taxa did not include Flavobacteriia (Lemke et al, 2009), and Bacteroidetes were not detected in a small survey of bacteria in the tropical Solimões and Negro River tributaries of the Amazon (Peixoto et al, 2011). A small fraction of sequences from an Amazon River metagenome mapped to Bacteroidetes, but it is not clear whether those taxa were Flavobacteriia (Ghai et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actinobacteria and Betaproteobacteria dominated all river communities, but the Amazon and Tapajós rivers had higher proportions of Chloroflexi, Acidobacteria, Nitrospirae, and Deltaproteobacteria than other rivers, and a much lower proportion of Flavobacteriia and other Bacteroidetes ( Figure 5B ). Bacteroidetes were detected in the tropical Paraná River, but these taxa did not include Flavobacteriia (Lemke et al, 2009), and Bacteroidetes were not detected in a small survey of bacteria in the tropical Solimões and Negro River tributaries of the Amazon (Peixoto et al, 2011). A small fraction of sequences from an Amazon River metagenome mapped to Bacteroidetes, but it is not clear whether those taxa were Flavobacteriia (Ghai et al, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many studies describing microbial communities have focused on water environments, such as estuaries101112, rivers1314, lakes151617, and oceans1819. Although researchers have also evaluated bacterioplankton communities within these water environments, few studies of planktonic archaeal communities in freshwater habitats have been performed, particularly in fluvial ecosystems20.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En un estudio realizado para analizar la diversidad microbiana presente en el río Negro (afluente del Amazonas, Brasil), se identificó como filo predominante (81 %) Proteobacteria (Neves, 2013). Igualmente, el filo Proteobacteria fue el más abundante en todas las muestras de ríos y lagos de la región amazónica de Brasil (Peixoto et al, 2011;Rodrigues, 2011;Toyama, 2012), el cual es característico de ambientes de agua dulce (Zwart et al, 2002).…”
Section: Filosunclassified
“…Ciertas estimaciones indican que aproximadamente 99 % de los microorganismos presentes en muchos ambientes naturales, no son cultivables en laboratorio mediante técnicas tradicionales de cultivo (Amann et al, 1995). Los avances recientes en biología molecular, especialmente en la tecnología de secuenciación del ácido desoxirribonucleico (DNA, según sus siglas en inglés), han brindado más oportunidades para estudios exhaustivos de microorganismos en diversos ecosistemas (Parmar et al, 2019), específicamente realizando análisis metagenómico (genomas secuenciados directamente de la muestra ambiental, sin necesidad de cultivo y aislamiento de microorganismos en laboratorio), para determinar de manera más realista la diversidad bacteriana (Peixoto et al, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified