2007
DOI: 10.1049/iet-map:20050327
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bandgaps of mushroom-type EBG surface and corrugated and strip-type soft surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
41
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this example a central position of the vias has been selected. The use of vias in other positions will provide a more compact structure if required [3].…”
Section: Design Of the Soft Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this example a central position of the vias has been selected. The use of vias in other positions will provide a more compact structure if required [3].…”
Section: Design Of the Soft Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two possibilities to this aim. The first one is to compute the dispersion diagram of the infinite structure in the "soft" direction as in [3]. Another simpler option is to compute the transmission coefficient S 12 of a finite structure composed of a few periods and see at which frequency the stop band is located.…”
Section: Design Of the Soft Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, EBG/HIS offers more degrees of freedom in controlling wave propagation, scattering from all directions and wide angles of incidence compared with soft surfaces [11]. The unit cell size is defined along the direction of soft, P s , as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%