2012 17th Opto-Electronics and Communications Conference 2012
DOI: 10.1109/oecc.2012.6276524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bandwidth expansion methods for optical transmission systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [33,34], PS-QPSK and PM-QPSK are compared at the same bit rate when forward error correcting codes (FEC) with different rates are applied to the two formats, and it is argued that PM-QPSK with a larger overhead code could possibly outperform uncoded PS-QPSK. A similar comparison would likely show that 16QAM would outperform both PM-QPSK and 128-SP-QAM, since the extra bit(s) could be used for FEC overhead.…”
Section: Forward Error Correction Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [33,34], PS-QPSK and PM-QPSK are compared at the same bit rate when forward error correcting codes (FEC) with different rates are applied to the two formats, and it is argued that PM-QPSK with a larger overhead code could possibly outperform uncoded PS-QPSK. A similar comparison would likely show that 16QAM would outperform both PM-QPSK and 128-SP-QAM, since the extra bit(s) could be used for FEC overhead.…”
Section: Forward Error Correction Codingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We then use polarization multiplexing to achieve the same SE and bandwidth as 28 Gbaud PS-QPSK. This case has been studied in simulations over an additive white Gaussian noise (AWGN) channel using the same LDPC code as in this paper and it was found that below a BER of ∼ 2.5 × 10 −2 , the LDPC-coded QPSK outperforms PS-QPSK in terms of required OSNR 12 . We assume that an outer FEC code is used, since the BER floor of this LDPC code is not known for the nonlinear fiber channel and it is unfeasible to measure such low BERs with offline processing.…”
Section: Ldpc-coded Modulationmentioning
confidence: 98%