1971
DOI: 10.1016/0030-5073(71)90033-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
307
3
1

Year Published

1978
1978
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,597 publications
(333 citation statements)
references
References 199 publications
16
307
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To our knowledge, the only study that directly investigated this issue with quasi-experimental methods failed to find support for it (Christensen-Szalansky & Bushyhead, 1981), although the authors attributed their negative finding to possible artifacts. The Christensen-Szalansky and Bushyhead (1981)'s study used Bayes' theorem as criterion for evaluating physicians' calibration, but its nature was correlational (Slovic & Lichtenstein, 1971). Accordingly, in the present experiments we used orthogonal designs instead of intercorrelated cues that are representative of the real world.…”
Section: Main Finding: the Feature-positive Effect On The Evaluation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To our knowledge, the only study that directly investigated this issue with quasi-experimental methods failed to find support for it (Christensen-Szalansky & Bushyhead, 1981), although the authors attributed their negative finding to possible artifacts. The Christensen-Szalansky and Bushyhead (1981)'s study used Bayes' theorem as criterion for evaluating physicians' calibration, but its nature was correlational (Slovic & Lichtenstein, 1971). Accordingly, in the present experiments we used orthogonal designs instead of intercorrelated cues that are representative of the real world.…”
Section: Main Finding: the Feature-positive Effect On The Evaluation mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Brehmer & Brehmer, 1988;B. Brehmer, 1994;Cooksey, 1996;Hammond et al, 1975;Libby & Lewis, 1982;Slovic & Lichtenstein, 1971). In general, achievement is high and judgments are considered to be the result of a linear, additive process in which a few, differentially weighted cues are used.…”
Section: Social Judgment Theory Policy Capturing and The Importancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, Bar-Hillel (1973), Tversky and Kahneman (1983) and others have found systematic biases in the formation of the probabilities of conjunctions of both independent and non-independent events. For surveys, discussions and examples of the psychological literature on the formation and handling of probabilities see Edwards, Lindman and Savage (1963), Slovic and Lichtenstein (1971), Tversky and Kahneman (1 974) and the collections in Acta Psychologica (December 1970), Kahneman, Slovic and Tversky (1982) and Arkes and Hammond (1986). For examples of how economists have responded to some of these issues see Arrow (1982), Viscusi (1985) and the references cited there.…”
Section: Two Issues Regarding Framingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In our 1971 article, we argued that, if the information in a gamble is processed differently when making choices and setting prices, it should be possible to construct pairs of gambles such that people would choose one member of the pair but set a higher price on the other." Slovic and Lichtenstein (1983) …”
Section: Two Interpretations Of This Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%