1988
DOI: 10.1097/00004836-198804000-00013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Beclomethasone Dipropionate and Prednisolone 21-Phosphate Enemas in the Treatment of Ulcerative Proctitis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
1
2

Year Published

1989
1989
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
26
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Two studies, one in patients with distal ulcerative colitis and one in patients with more extensive ulcerative colitis, suggested that topical administration of BDP is as effective as a prednisolone sodium enema and does not affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function [Mulder et al 1989;Campieri et al 1998]. On the contrary, another trial in patients with ulcerative proctitis suggested that a BDP enema was less effective than prednisolone 21-phosphate enema in ulcerative proctitis (Table 2) [ Van der Heide et al 1988]. Finally, three studies compared the efficacy of BDP, mesalamine and a combination of both drugs: one investigated topical mesalamine and a BDP enema [Mulder et al 1996], one investigated oral, controlled-release BDP with mesalamine [Rizzello et al 2002], and another compared topical BDP (36.7%) and topical mesalamine (29.2%) in 217 patients with distal active ulcerative colitis and demonstrated similar clinical remission rates between the two treatments [Gionchetti et al 2005].…”
Section: Efficacy In Ulcerative Colitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two studies, one in patients with distal ulcerative colitis and one in patients with more extensive ulcerative colitis, suggested that topical administration of BDP is as effective as a prednisolone sodium enema and does not affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function [Mulder et al 1989;Campieri et al 1998]. On the contrary, another trial in patients with ulcerative proctitis suggested that a BDP enema was less effective than prednisolone 21-phosphate enema in ulcerative proctitis (Table 2) [ Van der Heide et al 1988]. Finally, three studies compared the efficacy of BDP, mesalamine and a combination of both drugs: one investigated topical mesalamine and a BDP enema [Mulder et al 1996], one investigated oral, controlled-release BDP with mesalamine [Rizzello et al 2002], and another compared topical BDP (36.7%) and topical mesalamine (29.2%) in 217 patients with distal active ulcerative colitis and demonstrated similar clinical remission rates between the two treatments [Gionchetti et al 2005].…”
Section: Efficacy In Ulcerative Colitismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In patients with UC, BDP enemas have a similar efficacy to mesalazine and other steroid enemas in inducing remission of the disease [50,51,52,53,54,55,56], with a superiority of a combination of BDP and mesalazine enemas over single-agent therapy [57]. Oral BDP is effective in improving clinical, endoscopic and biopsy scores in patients with mild-to-moderate left-sided and extensive UC [58,59,60,61,62].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The investigators did not observe the rapid improvement seen with PP for BDP [3]. However, the same investigators found equal beneficial effects for 2 and 3 mg BDP enemas, respectively, in comparison with 30 mg PP [4]..…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%