2000
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2281.2000.00261.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bioimpedance and radioisotope methods in the estimation of extracellular water volume before and after coronary artery bypass grafting operation

Abstract: To estimate extracellular water volume (ECW) changes in connection with coronary artery bypass grafting operation, simultaneous ECW estimations by 51Cr-EDTA dilution and whole-body bioimpedance techniques were performed in 15 patients. The assessments of ECW were compared with patients' weighing results. Whole-body bioimpedance-derived ECW correlated significantly with 51Cr-EDTA dilution-based ECW in the pre-operative period (r=0.74; P<0.005); the bias was 0.2 +/- 1.1 l (+/-SD). In the post-operative period, t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PWV values obtained using this equation correlate well with values measured with Doppler ultrasound or applanation tonometry [32,33]. Whole-body bioimpedance-derived ECW correlates well with 51 Cr-EDTA dilution-based measurement of ECW (r ¼ 0.74, bias 0.2 ± 1.1 litres), as well as with perioperative weight changes of patients [34]. The repeatability and reproducibility of this measurement protocol has been previously established [32,35,36].…”
Section: Whole-body Impedance Cardiographysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…PWV values obtained using this equation correlate well with values measured with Doppler ultrasound or applanation tonometry [32,33]. Whole-body bioimpedance-derived ECW correlates well with 51 Cr-EDTA dilution-based measurement of ECW (r ¼ 0.74, bias 0.2 ± 1.1 litres), as well as with perioperative weight changes of patients [34]. The repeatability and reproducibility of this measurement protocol has been previously established [32,35,36].…”
Section: Whole-body Impedance Cardiographysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…The CircMon ® evaluates ECW volume by the formula ECW = k*(H 2 /Z), coefficient k (Ω*cm) derived from blood resistivity and the relation between the distance of voltage electrodes, H is body height (cm), and Z is the recorded impedance of the body. The bioimpedance‐derived ECW volume correlates well with 51 Cr‐EDTA dilution‐based ECW measurement ( n = 15, r = 0.74, bias 0.2 ± 1.1 L, mea n ± SD) [27]. The ECW balance is calculated as ECW/ECW predicted .…”
Section: Whole‐body Impedance Cardiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…as the left ventricle contracts and blood flows into the thoracic aorta. Bio-impedance measures the changes in amplitude of the voltage change across the thorax [97]. Both positive and negative studies have been published, with some suggesting bio-impedance to be a useful non-invasive method to assess extracellular volume changes in patients undergoing cardiac surgery, with a close relationship with thermodilution [98,99], while others reported a negative correlation between the accuracy of bio-impedance and increased fluid accumulation within the thorax [100][101][102].…”
Section: Bio-impedance and Bio-reactancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast to the bio-impedance method, studies showed a good relationship between CO determined by bio-reactance and minimally invasive methods or thermodilution method [103][104][105]. Bio-reactance can be an accurate method to assess fluid responsiveness in critically ill patients and in patients undergoing major abdominal-pelvic surgery [97,[103][104][105]. Nevertheless, measurement of CO and other parameters can be disturbed by changes in tissue oedema, pleural effusions, arrhythmias, electrical interference, pacemakers or motion [105,106].…”
Section: Bio-impedance and Bio-reactancementioning
confidence: 99%