2018
DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.13300.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of body composition changes between low calorie high protein diet to standard protein in obese individuals with weight cycling – a randomised trial

Abstract: Background: The world prevalence of obesity in adult population in 2014 was nearly 13% while in Indonesia, it has reached 32.9% in the same year. Obesity is an established risk factors for cardiovascular diseases. A large proportion of people who had succeeded to reduce body weight failed to maintain it (weight cycling). Studies were inconclusive about the best composition in the diet for such people. The purpose of this research was to evaluate the body composition changes resulted from low calorie high prote… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is inconsistent with clinical trials done in Iran (3), which found that a highprotein diet showed significant reduction in fat mass (28.05 ±2.38 kg to 24.85 ±3.06 kg), compared to a normal protein diet (29.55 ±6.09 kg to 26.00 ±5.43 kg), with a high protein diet showing less loss in fat-free mass than the normal protein diet. Another study also showed significant differences in pre-and postintervention fat mass for a high-protein diet (31.46 ±7.69 kg to 28.43 ±8.65 kg) (p=0.001), but is not significant when comparing a high-protein diet to a normal protein diet (p=0.062) (9). In both these studies the subjects were also put on a low caloric diet, which was not evaluated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…This is inconsistent with clinical trials done in Iran (3), which found that a highprotein diet showed significant reduction in fat mass (28.05 ±2.38 kg to 24.85 ±3.06 kg), compared to a normal protein diet (29.55 ±6.09 kg to 26.00 ±5.43 kg), with a high protein diet showing less loss in fat-free mass than the normal protein diet. Another study also showed significant differences in pre-and postintervention fat mass for a high-protein diet (31.46 ±7.69 kg to 28.43 ±8.65 kg) (p=0.001), but is not significant when comparing a high-protein diet to a normal protein diet (p=0.062) (9). In both these studies the subjects were also put on a low caloric diet, which was not evaluated in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 47%
“…There are two parallel intervention group with the allocation ratio of 1:1, namely high protein (HP) and standard protein (SP) groups. There were no changes made to the methods after the study had been started (original trial protocol can be found in our sister article 11 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diet programmes were conducted over 8 weeks. Subjects were asked to self-report daily food consumptionin a logbook (see supplementary material on our sister article 11 ). Subjects were also followed up daily by cellphone texting and and weekly counselling by direct meeting with each participant to ensure adherence to the diet plan.…”
Section: Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two intervention groups with the allocation ratio 1:1, namely high protein (HP) group and standard protein (SP) group. There were no changes made to the methods after the study had been started (original trial protocol can be found in our sister article 10 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%