2017
DOI: 10.1140/epjst/e2016-60326-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Boltzmann and Gibbs entropies for the analysis of single-chain phase transitions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the semi-flexible chains (0.56L<1), a smeared out step is still there for L=0.56 but is smoothed out for larger L , while, at the same time, a maximum in the entropy occurs at finite energy. For energies larger than this value, the inverse micro-canonical temperature becomes negative, a well known behavior for the Boltzmann entropy of finite systems, which can be avoided by using the Gibbs definition of entropy [40,41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the semi-flexible chains (0.56L<1), a smeared out step is still there for L=0.56 but is smoothed out for larger L , while, at the same time, a maximum in the entropy occurs at finite energy. For energies larger than this value, the inverse micro-canonical temperature becomes negative, a well known behavior for the Boltzmann entropy of finite systems, which can be avoided by using the Gibbs definition of entropy [40,41].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We divided the configuration space of microstates (conformations) into regions containing microstates for a particular “macrostate”, which we have defined by a pair of two energy terms (Env,nst) (assuming a given εst) and accumulated the two-Dimensional Density of States (2D DoS) function g(Env,nst). The 2D DoS function has essential advantages in comparison with the 1D DoS function, described and explained in [9,10,11,43,44,45], although it is much more time consuming in simulations. We used two types of trial Monte Carlo moves: a local displacement of a randomly-chosen monomer unit (uniformly in the interval [0.05;0.05] along each axis) and an “end-cut-and-regrow” move [11].…”
Section: Model and Simulation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, classical spin systems where the kinetic energy is usually not defined in the Hamiltonian. However, here we are concerned with the "real" microcanonical ensemble wherein the kinetic energy part is also considered [26,27]. The integration over the momentum variables can be performed analytically in (4) and leads to…”
Section: A Microcanonical Ensemblementioning
confidence: 99%