2009
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-00196-3_11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Boosting Based Terrain Classification Using Proprioceptive and Exteroceptive Data

Abstract: Summary. The terrain classification is a very important subject to the all-terrain robotics community. The knowledge of the type of terrain allows a rover to deal with its environment more efficiently. The work presented in this paper shows that it is possible to differentiate terrains based on their aspects, using exteroceptive sensors, as well as based on their influence on the rover's behavior, using proprioceptive sensors. Using a boosting method (AdaBoost), these two sets of classifiers are trained and ap… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Motor currents and rate-of-turn of a robot were also correlated with soil parameters (Ojeda, Borenstein, Witus & Karlsen, 2006). Vibrations induced by wheelground interaction were fed to different types of terrain classifiers that discriminate based on, respectively, Mahalanobis distance of the power spectral densities (Brooks & Iagnemma, 2005), AdaBoost (Krebs, Pradalier & Siegwart, 2009), and neural network (Dupont, Moore, Collins & Coyle, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Motor currents and rate-of-turn of a robot were also correlated with soil parameters (Ojeda, Borenstein, Witus & Karlsen, 2006). Vibrations induced by wheelground interaction were fed to different types of terrain classifiers that discriminate based on, respectively, Mahalanobis distance of the power spectral densities (Brooks & Iagnemma, 2005), AdaBoost (Krebs, Pradalier & Siegwart, 2009), and neural network (Dupont, Moore, Collins & Coyle, 2008).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, exteroceptive and proprioceptive features were applied separately showing comparable results but no attempt was made to combine them (Krebs, Pradalier & Siegwart, 2009). A self-supervised learning framework was proposed using a proprioceptive terrain classifier to train an exteroceptive (i.e., vision-based) terrain classifier (Brooks & Iagnemma, 2007).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the exploration step we used a simple thresholdbased binary terrain classifier to automatically label the holes in the analyzed areas. Example of more advanced terrain classification can be seen in [31] and [32]. Results using 3 An object generates an occluded area on the VRS (first row).…”
Section: A Experimental Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When it comes to terrain interaction in robotics, most work is done using terrain classification [43]. This involves identifying which out of a few predefined terrain classes a new sample belongs to.…”
Section: Legged Roboticsmentioning
confidence: 99%