2011
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2737
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Brain MR Images at 1.5T Using BLADE and Rectilinear Techniques for Patients Who Move during Data Acquisition

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: MR imaging of moving patients can be challenging and motion correction techniques have been proposed though some have associated new artifacts. The objective of this study was to semiquantitatively compare brain MR images of moving patients obtained at 1.5T by using partially radial and rectilinear acquisition techniques.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Susceptibility artifacts were most severe in DW ss‐EPI, and they were well suppressed in DW rs‐EPI. This was concordant with previous reports (Attenberger et al, ; Nyberg et al, ; Morelli et al, ). DW BLADE showed the best suppression of susceptibility artifacts but not the best CS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Susceptibility artifacts were most severe in DW ss‐EPI, and they were well suppressed in DW rs‐EPI. This was concordant with previous reports (Attenberger et al, ; Nyberg et al, ; Morelli et al, ). DW BLADE showed the best suppression of susceptibility artifacts but not the best CS.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 94%
“…Although previous reports have suggested a preference for DW BLADE over DW ss‐EPI due to the lack of bulk susceptibility artifacts (Attenberger et al, ; Fries et al, ), no benefit regarding the CS was observed for DW BLADE in our study. DW BLADE was designed to suppress susceptibility artifacts at the cost of acquisition time (Attenberger et al, ; Nyberg et al, ). Our results indicate the excellent suppression of susceptibility artifacts in DW BLADE (Table ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… Within the sequences different technologies are available, for example 3D T 1 magnetization prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo (MPRAGE) or generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisitions (GRAPPA) (Lindholm et al, ), T 2 * gradient echo (GRE) or susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) (de Souza et al, ), or conventional Cartesian or PROPELLER T 2 or FLAIR sequences (Nyberg ). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that other sequences were not affected, adaptation of motion artifact reducing techniques [16], [17] will help to further improve the value of T2-TSE-imaging at 7 T. T2-weighted TSE at 7 T exhibits high RF power deposition owing to the use of a train of refocusing RF pulses. We were able to acquire 20 slices per patient (superior-inferior [S-I] coverage: 7 cm), which can be considered sufficient, if the site of the lesion is known.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%