Comparison of brush and biopsy sampling methods of the ileal pouch for assessment of mucosa-associated microbiota of human subjects

Abstract

BackgroundMucosal biopsy is the most common sampling technique used to assess microbial communities associated with the intestinal mucosa. Biopsies disrupt the epithelium and can be associated with complications such as bleeding. Biopsies sample a limited area of the mucosa, which can lead to potential sampling bias. In contrast to the mucosal biopsy, the mucosal brush technique is less invasive and provides greater mucosal coverage, and if it can provide equivalent microbial community data, it would be preferable to mucosal biopsies.ResultsWe compared microbial samples collected from the intestinal mucosa using either a cytology brush or mucosal biopsy forceps. We collected paired samples from patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who had previously undergone colectomy and ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA), and profiled the microbial communities of the samples by sequencing V4-V6 or V4-V5 16S rRNA-encoding gene amplicons. Comparisons of 177 taxa in 16 brush-biopsy sample pairs had a mean R2 of 0.94. We found no taxa that varied significantly between the brush and biopsy samples after adjusting for multiple comparisons (false discovery rate ≤0.05). We also tested the reproducibility of DNA amplification and sequencing in 25 replicate pairs and found negligible variation (mean R2 = 0.99). A qPCR analysis of the two methods showed that the relative yields of bacterial DNA to human DNA were several-fold higher in the brush samples than in the biopsies.ConclusionsMucosal brushing is preferred to mucosal biopsy for sampling the epithelial-associated microbiota. Although both techniques provide similar assessments of the microbial community composition, the brush sampling method has relatively more bacterial to host DNA, covers a larger surface area, and is less traumatic to the epithelium than the mucosal biopsy.

Detecting Microbial Dysbiosis Associated with Pediatric Crohn Disease Despite the High Variability of the Gut Microbiota

“…While log-transformations have become standard in other areas of bioinformatics (Quackenbush, 2002), they are not universally used in microbiome research (Gevers et al, 2014; White et al, 2009; Huse et al, 2014). Although a few microbiome studies have incorporated log-transformations in their analysis (Hong et al, 2006), untransformed data or non-parametric statistical tests are predominantly used to detect associations (Le Chatelier et al, 2013; David et al, 2014; Qin et al, 2014; Wang et al, 2014).…”

Influence of Land Use, Nutrients, and Geography on Microbial Communities and Fecal Indicator Abundance at Lake Michigan Beaches

“…Read-pairs with more than three mismatches within the ϳ80-nucleotide overlap were removed, and Ն66% of the nucleotides in the nonoverlapping regions had to have a score of ϾQ30 (26). The program UCHIME (27) was used to remove chimera sequences using the methods outlined by Huse et al (28). Taxonomy was assigned through the Global Alignment for Sequence Taxonomy (GAST) using a 16S rRNA hypervariable region reference database (29).…”

The Human Mycobiome

“…For the human intestinal mycobiome, feces are most frequently used as a convenient and noninvasive sample type from which to obtain an overview of the types of organisms present in the intestinal tract (LaTuga et al 2011;Hoffmann et al 2013). In some circumstances, bowel biopsies or surgical samples (oral cavity through to rectum) may be available and processed to identify mucosalassociated organisms, which may be disproportionately represented in the feces (Araú jo-Pérez et al 2012;Huse et al 2014). The lung may be sampled through induced deep sputum samples or endoscopy and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), in which the airways are directly visualized, washed with saline, and sampled by vacuum suctioning of an applied wash (CabreraRubio et al 2012;Lynch and Bruce 2013).…”