2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpx.2019.100030
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bulk and microfluidics methods for the formulation of poly-lactic-co-glycolic acid (PLGA) nanoparticles modified with cell-penetrating peptides of different architectures

Abstract: Graphical abstract

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Nanoprecipitation, as a formulation method for NPs, is impressive with its simplicity and efficiency [ 17 ] and was, therefore, applied as the first technique for the encapsulation of BRP-187 ( Figure 1 B) into PLGA particles [ 9 ]. However, the bulk procedure is often limited with respect to increasing the polymer concentration and drug loading without increasing the particle sizes and distributions as well as stability problems [ 9 , 15 ]. To overcome the lack of control and precision during particle formation by bulk preparation, the formulation of BRP-187 in PLGA particles was investigated within a herringbone staggered mixing chip ( Figure 1 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nanoprecipitation, as a formulation method for NPs, is impressive with its simplicity and efficiency [ 17 ] and was, therefore, applied as the first technique for the encapsulation of BRP-187 ( Figure 1 B) into PLGA particles [ 9 ]. However, the bulk procedure is often limited with respect to increasing the polymer concentration and drug loading without increasing the particle sizes and distributions as well as stability problems [ 9 , 15 ]. To overcome the lack of control and precision during particle formation by bulk preparation, the formulation of BRP-187 in PLGA particles was investigated within a herringbone staggered mixing chip ( Figure 1 A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved stability, bioavailability, and efficiency of the BRP-187-loaded NPs compared to the free compound in suppressing 5-LO product formation and PGE 2 biosynthesis in intact cells were observed and underlined the promising perspective for the use of this substance/class of substances in the near future [ 9 ]. In view of upcoming in vivo studies or clinical applications, the formulation still lacks control and precision, particularly in terms of higher LC values and scale-up possibilities [ 15 , 16 , 17 ]. Thus, in order to eliminate the drawback of the conventional bulk nanoprecipitation method [ 15 ] and to increase the final drug loading capacity while the size and dispersity of the particles remain similar, the preparation of the PLGA(BRP-187) NPs was transferred from batch nanoprecipitation to a microfluidic approach in the presented study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Taking into account the successfulness of PLGA in DDS, the rapidly developing microfluidic technology was quickly introduced into the formulation of PLGA micor-and nanoparticles. Different chip geometries, formulation compounds and PLGA conjugates were explored, demonstrating improved control over the particle properties and resulting in various sophisticated PLGA-based nanocarrier systems [64][65][66].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Poly (lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA)-based particles is one of the most effective biodegradable polymeric particles and the only FDA-approved IA delivery system ( 42 ). However, due to their negative surface charge ( 43 ), the PLGA-based drug delivery systems are not effective for targeting middle and deep cartilage unless extremely high drug doses are used ( 39, 44 ). Compared to the above nanoparticles, phospholipid micelles we used here for loading sPLA 2 i have several advantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%