2017
DOI: 10.4103/0259-1162.206859
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of bupivacaine plus magnesium sulfate and ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate infiltration for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy: A randomized double-blinded study

Abstract: Aim:The objective of this study was to assess and compare the analgesic duration of local infiltration of bupivacaine plus magnesium sulfate and ropivacaine plus magnesium sulfate for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy.Study Design:A randomized, prospective, double-blinded single hospital, comparative study.Methods:Sixty adult patients of the American Society of Anesthesiologists physical Status I and II were randomly allocated into two Groups BM and RM, comprising 30 and 31 pati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One RCT did not show a significant analgesic benefit after wound instillation [43]. Another RCT compared the infiltration of two different local anaesthetics without a placebo group [45]. It is possible that some of the benefits from local anaesthetic wound instillation may be due to migration of local anaesthetic into the neuraxial planes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One RCT did not show a significant analgesic benefit after wound instillation [43]. Another RCT compared the infiltration of two different local anaesthetics without a placebo group [45]. It is possible that some of the benefits from local anaesthetic wound instillation may be due to migration of local anaesthetic into the neuraxial planes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hazarika et al compared local wound infiltration with 20 ml of bupivacaine 0.25% combined with magnesium sulphate 500 mg to 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.25% combined with magnesium sulphate 500 mg [45]. Rescue analgesia included IV nalbuphine.…”
Section: Locoregional Anaesthesiamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 17 ] According to Hazarika et al ., wound infiltration with bupivacaine and magnesium sulfate offered a longer duration of postoperative analgesia and considerably decreased postoperative opioid usage in patients following lumbar laminectomy compared to ropivacaine and magnesium sulfate. [ 18 ] Eldaba et al . discovered that continuous wound infiltration with a mixture of bupivacaine and magnesium sulfate after cesarean section provided effective analgesia and reduced postoperative patient-controlled analgesia requirements when compared to continuous wound infiltration with LA alone or placebo, with fewer opioid adverse effects.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As NMDA receptors are present in both the central nervous system and in the peripheral tissues such as the skin and the muscles, magnesium sulphate with its NMDA receptor antagonistic property, effectively reduces the central and peripheral mechanism of pain transmission, modulation, sensitization. 6,7 Dexmedetomidine is a selective α-2 adrenoreceptor agonist used as sedative as well as adjuvant anesthetic. 3 Several mechanisms have been postulated for its analgesic action which include reduction in conduction of impulses in afferent pain fibers, anti-inflammatory effects by decreasing the production of inflammatory cytokines, α2-adrenergic receptor mediated vasoconstriction leading to prolonged analgesic effect and central analgesic due to its systemic absorption.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The anaesthesiologist explained the visual analogue pain scale (VAS) score to the patient preoperatively and obtained preoperative VAS by asking the average intensity of pain at the pre-anaesthetic check-up, with score 0: No pain, 1-3: Mild pain, 4-6: Moderate pain, 7-9 Severe pain and 10: The worst imaginable pain. 7 In the operating room, standard ASA monitors were attached, and baseline vitals were recorded. All the patients were premedicated with injection fentanyl 2 µg/kg intravenously (IV) followed by induction with IV propofol 2 mg/kg.…”
Section: Exclusion Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%