2012
DOI: 10.1097/adm.0b013e318233d621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Buprenorphine Treatment for Opioid Dependence in 3 Settings

Abstract: Although use of buprenorphine in the treatment of opioid dependence is expected to continue to increase, little is known about the optimal setting for providing the medical and psychosocial care required with buprenorphine pharmacotherapy. OBJECTIVE This study compared buprenorphine therapy delivered in three distinct treatment settings: an opioid-treatment program (OTP) offering individual counseling; a group counseling program utilizing the manualized Matrix Model (MMM) of cognitive-behavioral treatment; an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Support from these providers is critical for expanding naloxone distribution to at-risk populations, who may not have any other point of contact for overdose prevention education or naloxone prescription. Previous work indicates that buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence is safe, feasible, and cost effective (Mintzer et al, 2007;Miotto et al, 2012;(Raisch, Fye, Boardman, & Sather, 2002;Schackman, Leff, Polsky, Moore, & Fiellin, 2012), with demonstrated capacity of prescribers to address addiction in the primary care setting. Incorporating overdose training and response into the medication assisted therapy conversation can build on these prior successes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Support from these providers is critical for expanding naloxone distribution to at-risk populations, who may not have any other point of contact for overdose prevention education or naloxone prescription. Previous work indicates that buprenorphine/naloxone treatment for opioid dependence is safe, feasible, and cost effective (Mintzer et al, 2007;Miotto et al, 2012;(Raisch, Fye, Boardman, & Sather, 2002;Schackman, Leff, Polsky, Moore, & Fiellin, 2012), with demonstrated capacity of prescribers to address addiction in the primary care setting. Incorporating overdose training and response into the medication assisted therapy conversation can build on these prior successes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miotto and colleagues (43) randomized 94 opioid- dependent individuals to one of three treatment sites in which they received buprenorphine maintenance treatment over a 52-week period: (1) an opioid treatment program that provided supportive counseling by a certified counselor at the time of the medication visit (weekly during weeks 1–6 and monthly during weeks 7–52), (2) a primary care setting in which a physician provided brief counseling at the time of the study visits (also weekly during weeks 1–6 and monthly during weeks 7–52), or (3) behaviorally-oriented psychosocial treatment using the Matrix Model, in which cognitive-behavioral therapy groups were offered weekly for weeks 1–52. At week 20, there were significant differences by setting in terms of retention (21% in the opioid treatment program, 33% in the primary care setting, and 51% in the Matrix Model, p =.05).…”
Section: Overview Of the Four Trials Showing No Benefit Of Adding Coumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The buprenorphine/naloxone combination lowers the likelihood of intravenous abuse because injected naloxone can precipitate opioid withdrawal (Tompkins and Strain, 2011). Buprenorphine has been safely and effectively implemented in various community settings: opioid treatment programs, non-methadone outpatient programs, community health centers, and medical practices (Miotto et al, 2012; Mitchell et al, 2012). In community settings, it has been effective in reducing heroin use and retaining patients in treatment (Alford et al, 2011; Mattick et al, 2009; Miotto et al, 2012; Mitchell et al, 2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%