2022
DOI: 10.3390/app12199882
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of Canopy Cover and Leaf Area Index Estimation from Airborne LiDAR and Digital Aerial Photogrammetry in Tropical Forests

Abstract: Digital aerial photogrammetry (DAP) has emerged as an alternative to airborne laser scanning (ALS) for forest inventory applications, as it offers a low-cost and flexible three-dimensional (3D) point cloud. Unlike the forest inventory attributes (e.g., tree height and diameter at breast height), the relative ability of DAP and ALS in predicting canopy structural variables (i.e., canopy cover and leaf area index (LAI)) has not been sufficiently investigated by previous studies. In this study, we comprehensively… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Agisof Photoscan and ArcGIS processed drone images to obtain a canopy coverage area for each sample. Canopy cover refers to the extent of tree or shrub coverage observed from an aerial perspective, encompassing the leaves, branches, and trunk [18]. Therefore, the canopy cover in this study was presented in m 2 area units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agisof Photoscan and ArcGIS processed drone images to obtain a canopy coverage area for each sample. Canopy cover refers to the extent of tree or shrub coverage observed from an aerial perspective, encompassing the leaves, branches, and trunk [18]. Therefore, the canopy cover in this study was presented in m 2 area units.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The improved progressive triangulation filtering algorithm was used to extract ground points for elevation normalization [45]. Single-tree segmentation was conducted based on seed points generated by the canopy height model [46]. Figure 4 demonstrates the differences before and after point cloud data processing.…”
Section: Lidar Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%