1995
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9673(94)01108-q
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of capillary zone electrophoresis with ion chromatography and standard photometric methods for the determination of inorganic anions in atmospheric aerosols

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Filters used in air sampling provide such a challenge, with anions such as phosphate, methanesulfonate and oxalate being present in low concentrations and chloride, sulfate and acetate occurring at concentrations an order of magnitude greater. The analysis of air filter samples for anions is traditionally performed using ion chromatography [18][19][20], with relatively few uses of CE for such samples having been reported [21][22][23][24][25]. DabekZlotorzynska et al [21,24,25] used a pyromellitate electrolyte and indirect detection at 254 nm to determine nitrate, nitrite, chloride, oxalate, and sulfate in air filter samples.…”
Section: Analysis Of Air Filter Samplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Filters used in air sampling provide such a challenge, with anions such as phosphate, methanesulfonate and oxalate being present in low concentrations and chloride, sulfate and acetate occurring at concentrations an order of magnitude greater. The analysis of air filter samples for anions is traditionally performed using ion chromatography [18][19][20], with relatively few uses of CE for such samples having been reported [21][22][23][24][25]. DabekZlotorzynska et al [21,24,25] used a pyromellitate electrolyte and indirect detection at 254 nm to determine nitrate, nitrite, chloride, oxalate, and sulfate in air filter samples.…”
Section: Analysis Of Air Filter Samplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As can be seen from the table, the large majority of studies showed no comparison data. For the few that did, the comparison has been mainly between CZE and IC [3,23,25,41,43,45,63,65,67,70,72,74,76,77,84,86,96,97,104,106,110,111,113,119,124,126,127,131,134,135,140,141,146,148,149,152,158,174,190,194,195,219]. Typical examples include studies by Yang et al [126], who found that results obtained using a high-sensitivity method developed using sample stacking technique together with the use of an internal standard correlated well with a standard IC method, and work by Fung and Lau [149], who examined a CZE method for the analysis of inorganic anions in rainwater and used an IC technique in parallel, reporting that the results for the major anions were within statistical variation.…”
Section: Evaluating Accuracymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As chromophore and buffer have been employed phtalate [11,15,18,62,67,72,73,91,98,100], benzoate [9,36,81,82,85,86], PDC [5,6,10,14,20,25,38,61,75], TMA [22,45,54,57,58,74], MES [16,31], PMA [36,37,41,82], 2,4-dihydroxybenzoic acid with e-aminocaproic acid [35,96], 1,2-dimethylimidazole and trimellitic acid [13], p-hydroxybenzoate [40,43,47,63], p-anisate [84], 3,5-dinitrobenzoic acid [42], salicylic acid with Tris [48,52], benzoic acid and Tris [107], NDC [39], ...…”
Section: Background Electrolytementioning
confidence: 99%