2020
DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08058-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Comparison of capping and mixing of calcined dolomite and zeolite for interrupting the release of nutrients from contaminated lake sediment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the pH of UN-CAP was maintained at pH 7.7, the pHs of overlying-water under CRCMs capping conditions were observed higher than that of UN-CAP. The pH increase under the capping condition was due to the alkaline nature of the capping materials: the dissolution of Ca 2+ from CRCMs increases the pH of the overlying water as Ca is a base cation (Alvarado et al 2020;McBride 1994). The decrease in pH under capping conditions from day 28 to day 70 indicates that the potential toxic effect associated with pH decreases over time.…”
Section: Properties Of River Water and Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the pH of UN-CAP was maintained at pH 7.7, the pHs of overlying-water under CRCMs capping conditions were observed higher than that of UN-CAP. The pH increase under the capping condition was due to the alkaline nature of the capping materials: the dissolution of Ca 2+ from CRCMs increases the pH of the overlying water as Ca is a base cation (Alvarado et al 2020;McBride 1994). The decrease in pH under capping conditions from day 28 to day 70 indicates that the potential toxic effect associated with pH decreases over time.…”
Section: Properties Of River Water and Sedimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., (2018) demonstrated that the efficiency of sediment capping using active thin-layer capping with natural zeolite with 2 cm thickness, resulted in the inhibition of NH4 + and PO4 3-. Zeolite was proven to be effective for interrupting the release of nitrogen (NH4-N, NO3-N) from contaminated lake sediment to the water (Alvarado et. al., 2020).…”
Section: Fig 2 Comparison Of Treatments Efficiency For Capping and Mi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…al., 2018;Gu et. al., 2019;Alvarado et. al., 2020) the methods for sediments contaminated remediation with NH4-N, NO3-N, PO4-P and heavy metals using bentonite and zeolite in lakes, fish farms and agricultural fields were differed in order to stabilize them and not release from sediments or soil to the water or to crops.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To minimize the risk of metal(loid) re-dissolution, in situ remediation by active capping or sediment augmentation with adsorbents has been studied as a less disruptive and lower-cost option for dredging and off-site treatment (Zhang et al 2016). In augmentation, adsorbent material is mixed in the sediment (Alvarado et al 2020), while in active capping, adsorbent is applied on the sediment surface as a thin, normally few centimeter-thick layer with the aid of geotextiles (Viana et al 2008;Zhang et al 2016). In addition to adsorption and other sequestration mechanisms, active capping also provides physical and chemical isolation for the sediment and reduces the flux of dissolved contaminants into the overlying water column (Zhang et al 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%